Jet propulsion and internal combustion engines and parts, aircraft, manufacturing · Arizona

Honeywell San Tan

Queen Creek, AZ · ~15 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Honeywell San Tan runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Jet propulsion and internal combustion engines and parts, aircraft, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Honeywell San Tan: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Jet propulsion and internal combustion engines and parts, aircraft, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Honeywell San Tan safety composite

Honeywell San Tan scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Honeywell San Tan held a steady TCR band

Honeywell San Tan's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 0.0 TCR.

2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336412 · Queen Creek, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/15
  • PHOTO Aviation Other : Vir…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~15 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Aviation Other : Virtual Employee Roll-Up Site (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Honeywell San Tan in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Honeywell San Tan averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Jet propulsion and internal combustion engines and parts, aircraft, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Honeywell San Tan TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Honeywell San Tan falls in its industry

366 Jet propulsion and internal co establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 15 Jet propulsion and internal co employers in Arizona.

Honeywell San Tan (15 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Honeywell San Tan
Honeywell San Tan (15 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Honeywell San Tan has fewer employees than the Jet propulsion and internal combustion e median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336412 · AZ · Queen Creek

366 Jet propulsion and internal combustion engines and parts, aircraft, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 41 employers in Queen Creek, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Aviation Other : Virtual Employee Roll-Up Site 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rolls-Royce: Merdian Center 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Curtiss-Wright -- Gilbert 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pratt & Whitney - West Palm Beach FL 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Scottsdale Shop 15 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fondomonte Corporate Office 15 FTE
STATE-SIZE Meritage Homes of Utah, Inc. 15 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ameritech - AZ 107 15 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 4451 456 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4451 406 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2365 - Queen Creek 311 FTE
CITY-NEAR QUEEAZ-INC-QUEEN CREEK,AZ - ARIZONA 307 FTE
NAT-TCR Integration Appliance Inc. 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 128 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Airborn Inc. Addison 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Keller Warehouse 0.0 TCR

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.