Fluidic devices, circuits, and systems for process control, manufacturing · Texas

Honeywell Solutions Center Houston

Houston, TX · ~90 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Honeywell Solutions Center Houston runs at 15% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Fluidic devices, circuits, and systems for process control, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Honeywell Solutions Center Houston: 0.5 TCR = 15% of Fluidic devices, circuits, and systems for process control, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Honeywell Solutions Center Houston safety composite

Honeywell Solutions Center Houston scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Honeywell Solutions Center Houston held a steady TCR band

Honeywell Solutions Center Houston's TCR held near 0.1 from 1.0 in 2021 to 0.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 1.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=1.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334513 · Houston, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 15% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/32
  • PHOTO Monitor Technologies…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~90 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Monitor Technologies LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Honeywell Solutions Center Houston in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Honeywell Solutions Center Houston averages 0.5 TCR (15% of the Fluidic devices, circuits, and systems for process control, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Honeywell Solutions Center Houston TCR series: 2021=1 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Honeywell Solutions Center Houston falls in its industry

322 Fluidic devices, circuits, and establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 32 Fluidic devices, circuits, and employers in Texas.

Honeywell Solutions Center Houston (90 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 96 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Honeywell Solutions Center Houston
Honeywell Solutions Center Houston (90 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 96 employees and a TCR of 1.3

Honeywell Solutions Center Houston has fewer employees than the Fluidic devices, circuits, and systems f median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.9 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.0 1.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334513 · TX · Houston

322 Fluidic devices, circuits, and systems for process control, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Monitor Technologies LLC 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rosemount Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Golden Valley 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR ISE-Mag Tech 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Chase Pecan, LP 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE Yates Field 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bridgeport Plant 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oklaunion Plant 90 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR Mandic Motors, Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Belmont Equipment and Techologies 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR CAI, Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Roncelli Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Penn Presbyterian Med. Trans. 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0198 Novato 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0214 Claremont 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE NEWBURGH 90 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.