Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities · Alaska

Hope Community Resources, Inc. - Mat-Su

Name: Hope Community Resources, Inc. - Mat-Su Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Wasilla, AK · ~23 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

D
Poor Safety Record: 5.5
Avg TCR: 3.8
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hope Community Resources, Inc. - Mat-Su runs at 146% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Hope Community Resources, Inc. - Mat-Su: 5.5 TCR = 146% of Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hope Community Resources, Inc. - Mat-Su safety composite

Hope Community Resources, Inc. - Mat-Su scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): D 5.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.1

2022→2023

Hope Community Resources, Inc. - Mat-Su injury rate improved

Hope Community Resources, Inc. - Mat-Su's TCR fell 11.1 from 11.1 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 11.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=11.1 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Wasilla, AK ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.5 · 146% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #3/6
PHOTO Barber National Inst…
BOOK 2y book
INJ 1 inj
SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Barber National Institute - Philadelphia Maple (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alaska employers → · Look up another →

Jawonio Main C

5.6
COR-TMI-CORONA

5.6
This site

5.5
Barber Nationa

5.5
Community Opti

5.5

What this shows Hope Community Resources, Inc. - Mat-Su averages 5.5 TCR (146% of the Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS benchmark).

Hope Community Resources, Inc. - Mat-Su TCR series: 2022=11.1 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Hope Community Resources, Inc. - Mat-Su falls in its industry

1,320 Companion services for disable establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

Grade D

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alaska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 6 Companion services for disable employers in Alaska.

Hope Community Resources, Inc. - Mat-Su (23 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Hope Community Resources, Inc. - Mat-Su has fewer employees than the Companion services for disabled persons, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2023	0.0	0.0	0	0	0
2022	11.1	11.1	1	1	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · AK · Wasilla

1,320 Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,558 rated employers in Alaska with headcount on file · 54 employers in Wasilla, AK · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Barber National Institute - Philadelphia Maple	PHILADELPHIA, PA	5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Community Options Ocean County NJ	FORKED RIVER, NJ	5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Jawonio Main Campus	NEW CITY, NY	5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR	COR-TMI-CORONA OFFICE	CORONA, CA	5.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Rig 141	ANCHORAGE	23 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Rig 16	ANCHORAGE	23 FTE
STATE-SIZE	AWWU Asplund WWTF	ANCHORAGE	23 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Seward Highway - Mass Excavation	ANCHORAGE	23 FTE
CITY-NEAR	WM 2074	Wasilla	428 FTE
CITY-NEAR	2074	Wasilla	370 FTE
CITY-NEAR	701-00653	Wasilla	336 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Dept. of Corrections (34)	Wasilla	287 FTE
NAT-TCR	HG Fire Systems, LP	Houston, TX	5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	RydeTrans	San Leandro, CA	5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	M&M Transport - Indy Operations	Indianapolis, IN	5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	WEL-Life at Elk Point	Elk Point, SD	5.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Lambright Woodworking, LLC	Topeka, IN	23 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Seaboard Foods Lp Oklahoma Ground Maint	Guymon, OK	23 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Lagrange County Remc	Lagrange, IN	23 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Silver Eagle Beverages - Del Rio	Del Rio, TX	23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.