Sheltered workshops (i.e., work experience centers) · Missouri

Hope Haven Herriman St.

Chillicothe, MO · ~40 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hope Haven Herriman St. runs at 53% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Sheltered workshops (i.e., work experience centers) workplace, earning a grade B.

Hope Haven Herriman St.: 2.0 TCR = 53% of Sheltered workshops (i.e., work experience centers) BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hope Haven Herriman St. safety composite

Hope Haven Herriman St. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Hope Haven Herriman St. held a steady TCR band

Hope Haven Herriman St.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 4.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2021=4.2 · 2022=4.0 · 2023=3.8 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624310 · Chillicothe, MO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 53% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #29/84
  • PHOTO Clovernook Center fo…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Clovernook Center for the Blind and Visually Impaired (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Hope Haven Herriman St. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hope Haven Herriman St. averages 2.0 TCR (53% of the Sheltered workshops (i.e., work experience centers) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hope Haven Herriman St. TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2021=4.2 · 2022=4 · 2023=3.8 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Hope Haven Herriman St. falls in its industry

1,455 Sheltered workshops (i.e., wor establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #29 safest of 84 Sheltered workshops (i.e., wor employers in Missouri.

Hope Haven Herriman St. (40 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Hope Haven Herriman St.
Hope Haven Herriman St. (40 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Hope Haven Herriman St. has fewer employees than the Sheltered workshops (i.e., work experien median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.8 3.8 1 0 0
2022 4.0 0.0 1 0 0
2021 4.2 4.2 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624310 · MO · Chillicothe

1,455 Sheltered workshops (i.e., work experience centers) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 36 employers in Chillicothe, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Clovernook Center for the Blind and Visually Impaired 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR RWS TX NORTH TX WICHITA FALLS 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Headquarters 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR CTS Administration 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE George's Cassville Hatchery 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE 027 - Dorsett 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE 070 - Jefferson 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Berkeley 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hedrick Medical Center 1,013 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 135 246 FTE
CITY-NEAR 135 224 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chillicothe-Global Plastics- Injection M - F051 182 FTE
NAT-TCR Avera Health Avera Sacred Heart Hospital Campus 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Village of Oswego 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Memphis Recycyling 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Ragle Construction 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Compass HQ 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Russell Landscape Florida- Destin 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sidco Filter Company 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hammond Lead Products - Pottstown Plant 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.