Utility containers (e.g., baskets, bins, boxes, buckets, dishpans, pails), plastics (except foam), manufacturing · Oklahoma

Hopkins Manufacturing

Miami, OK · ~114 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hopkins Manufacturing runs at 102% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Utility containers (e.g., baskets, bins, boxes, buckets, dishpans, pails), plastics (except foam), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Hopkins Manufacturing: 3.4 TCR = 102% of Utility containers (e.g., baskets, bins, boxes, buckets, dishpans, pails), plastics (except foam), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hopkins Manufacturing safety composite

Hopkins Manufacturing scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 64% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.1

2022→2024

Hopkins Manufacturing injury rate improved

Hopkins Manufacturing's TCR fell 3.1 from 4.9 in 2022 to 1.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.26× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=4.9 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=1.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Miami, OK ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.4 · 102% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #11/26
  • PHOTO York Imperial Plastics
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~114 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: York Imperial Plastics (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oklahoma employers → · Look up another →

Hopkins Manufacturing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hopkins Manufacturing averages 3.4 TCR (102% of the Utility containers (e.g., baskets, bins, boxes, buckets, dishpans, pails), plastics (except foam), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hopkins Manufacturing TCR series: 2022=4.9 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=1.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Hopkins Manufacturing falls in its industry

2,838 Utility containers (e.g., bask establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oklahoma alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 26 Utility containers (e.g., bask employers in Oklahoma.

Hopkins Manufacturing (114 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Hopkins Manufacturing
Hopkins Manufacturing (114 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Hopkins Manufacturing has more employees than the Utility containers (e.g., baskets, bins, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.7 0.9 2 0 0
2023 3.5 3.5 4 0 0
2022 4.9 2.0 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · OK · Miami

2,838 Utility containers (e.g., baskets, bins, boxes, buckets, dishpans, pails), plastics (except foam), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,320 rated employers in Oklahoma with headcount on file · 45 employers in Miami, OK · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR York Imperial Plastics 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kelpac Medical 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR BCI 1 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR MFG Construction Products 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE W-S Mechanical Group, LLC 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE Berry Global Inc. (TUOK Facility) 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE Heater Specialists, LLC 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE RL Hudson and Company 114 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 28 318 FTE
CITY-NEAR White River Marine Group, LLC Miami, OK 315 FTE
CITY-NEAR 28 299 FTE
CITY-NEAR INTEGRIS Miami Hospital 273 FTE
NAT-TCR Realm Construction Company 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Emporl, LLC 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Dalkia US 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Fll-Technical Operations 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Stenstrom Excavation & Blacktop Group 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE Innerface Architectural Signage, Inc 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE Imtech 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amg Lyn 114 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.