Commercial and Institutional Building Construction · Pennsylvania

Horst Construction

Lancaster, PA · ~47 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.7
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Horst Construction runs at 196% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Commercial and Institutional Building Construction workplace, earning a grade D.

Horst Construction: 5.7 TCR = 196% of Commercial and Institutional Building Construction BLS 2.9 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Horst Construction safety composite

Horst Construction scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.7

2016→2024

Horst Construction injury rate improved

Horst Construction's TCR fell 3.7 from 8.4 in 2016 to 4.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 12.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.4 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=7.4 · 2019=4.0 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=11.9 · 2022=12.2 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=4.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Lancaster, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.7 · 196% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #198/251
  • PHOTO Catalyst Constructio…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Catalyst Construction, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Horst Construction in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Horst Construction averages 5.7 TCR (196% of the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Horst Construction TCR series: 2016=8.4 · 2017=0 · 2018=7.4 · 2019=4 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=11.9 · 2022=12.2 · 2023=0 · 2024=4.6 · BLS 2.9

Where Horst Construction falls in its industry

4,692 Commercial and Institutional B establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #198 safest of 251 Commercial and Institutional B employers in Pennsylvania.

Horst Construction (47 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Horst Construction
Horst Construction (47 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Horst Construction has fewer employees than the Commercial and Institutional Building Co median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.6 2.3 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 12.2 0.0 4 1 0
2021 11.9 8.0 5 1 0
2020 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2019 4.0 4.0 2 0 0
2018 7.4 7.4 3 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 8.4 6.3 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · PA · Lancaster

4,692 Commercial and Institutional Building Construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 450 employers in Lancaster, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Catalyst Construction, Inc. 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Garrett & Associates General Contractors 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Houck Industrial LLC 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Weaver Companies, Inc. 5.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dan Schantz Greenhouse (Rising Sun, MD) 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hillendale Services, LLC 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mansfield 14235 US Route 6, Mansfield, PA 16933 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Electric Division Wilkes Barre 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster General Health, LGH Hospital 7,424 FTE
CITY-NEAR LGHealth 7,215 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster General Hospital 6,528 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster General Medical Group 1,436 FTE
NAT-TCR Ferrous Metal Processing 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR NG Bellwood Reporting Center 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Rosecastle at Deerwood 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Gift of Life Michigan 5.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Express Plumbing Heating & Air 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Best Western Plus Inn of Williams 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE SPI Blow Molding, LLC 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Salem Electric 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.