Hospice care services, in home · Pennsylvania

Hospice & Community Care- Lancaster

Lancaster, PA · ~244 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.7
Avg TCR
5.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hospice & Community Care- Lancaster runs at 148% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Hospice care services, in home workplace, earning a grade D.

Hospice & Community Care- Lancaster: 7.7 TCR = 148% of Hospice care services, in home BLS 5.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hospice & Community Care- Lancaster safety composite

Hospice & Community Care- Lancaster scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Hospice & Community Care- Lancaster: 2.5 → 8.6 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 11.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.13× in 2023

Hospice & Community Care- Lancaster's TCR rose 6.1 from 2.5 in 2016 to 8.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 11.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1.13× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621610 · Lancaster, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 7.7 · 148% of ind

  • DART 8.6 DART
  • RANK #287/375
  • PHOTO RIS
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 53 inj
  • SIZE ~244 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: RIS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Hospice & Community Care- Lancaster in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hospice & Community Care- Lancaster averages 7.7 TCR (148% of the Hospice care services, in home BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hospice & Community Care- Lancaster TCR series: 2016=2.5 · 2018=11 · 2019=5.6 · 2021=8.3 · 2022=9.9 · 2023=8.6 · BLS 5.2

Where Hospice & Community Care- Lancaster falls in its industry

3,635 Hospice care services, in home establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #287 safest of 375 Hospice care services, in home employers in Pennsylvania.

Hospice & Community Care- Lancaster (244 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Hospice & Community Care- Lancaster
Hospice & Community Care- Lancaster (244 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Hospice & Community Care- Lancaster has more employees than the Hospice care services, in home median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 8.6 8.6 7 9 0
2022 9.9 6.8 9 10 0
2021 8.3 6.8 10 7 0
2019 5.6 3.1 10 1 0
2018 11.0 7.8 12 9 0
2016 2.5 1.5 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621610 · PA · Lancaster

3,635 Hospice care services, in home employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 450 employers in Lancaster, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR RIS 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR MaineGeneral Community Care - Augusta 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR NJ South Home Care-Cumberland 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cartersville Hospice 7.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ainsworth Inc. 244 FTE
STATE-SIZE A Crane Rental, LLC. 244 FTE
STATE-SIZE LAUREL PKG (JOHNSTOWN) PA 244 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eldorado Stone, LLC 244 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster General Health, LGH Hospital 7,424 FTE
CITY-NEAR LGHealth 7,215 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster General Hospital 6,528 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster General Medical Group 1,436 FTE
NAT-TCR Price Chopper #7 - PC07 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR L & W Cleveland 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR RiverMead 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Montezuma Specialty Care 7.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE ICM Corporation 244 FTE
NAT-SIZE Blue and Gold Fleet - Central Bay 244 FTE
NAT-SIZE Blue and Gold Fleet - Pier 41 244 FTE
NAT-SIZE Blue and Gold Fleet -Vallejo 244 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.