Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · Utah

Hospital Couriers Salt Lake City

Kaysville, UT · ~20 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hospital Couriers Salt Lake City runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade C.

Hospital Couriers Salt Lake City: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hospital Couriers Salt Lake City safety composite

Hospital Couriers Salt Lake City scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

86/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Hospital Couriers Salt Lake City held a steady TCR band

Hospital Couriers Salt Lake City's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 0.0 TCR.

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Kaysville, UT AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/56
  • PHOTO Detroit
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Detroit (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Utah employers → · Look up another →

Hospital Couriers Salt Lake City in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hospital Couriers Salt Lake City averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Hospital Couriers Salt Lake City TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · BLS 6.5

Where Hospital Couriers Salt Lake City falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Utah alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 56 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in Utah.

Hospital Couriers Salt Lake City (20 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Hospital Couriers Salt Lake City
Hospital Couriers Salt Lake City (20 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Hospital Couriers Salt Lake City has fewer employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · UT · Kaysville

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,861 rated employers in Utah with headcount on file · 20 employers in Kaysville, UT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Detroit 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Binghamton 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Port Chester 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Richmond East 0.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pro Formance, Inc. 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM Salt Lake City, LLC 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE LQ0686 Salt Lake City - Layton 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE WASHINGTON, UT #00528 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR 706-00277 245 FTE
CITY-NEAR Green Construction Enterprises 147 FTE
CITY-NEAR Parallon LLC 137 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fusion Imaging 130 FTE
NAT-TCR Portsmouth NNSY Commissary 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Columbus Health and Rehab 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Meijer 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR GeoCare, Inc. DBA Home Instead Senior Care 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hospital Couriers Denver (Cosp) 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Receiving Station E 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Exchange - LRS 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE 44918 - Bradenton Fac 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.