Plows, construction (e.g., excavating, grading), manufacturing · Michigan

Houghton County Road Commission

Hancock, MI · ~44 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Houghton County Road Commission runs at 95% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Plows, construction (e.g., excavating, grading), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Houghton County Road Commission: 3.1 TCR = 95% of Plows, construction (e.g., excavating, grading), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Houghton County Road Commission safety composite

Houghton County Road Commission scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.4

2016→2024

Houghton County Road Commission injury rate improved

Houghton County Road Commission's TCR fell 9.4 from 9.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 9.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.4 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333120 · Hancock, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.1 · 95% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/15
  • PHOTO The Cote Corporation
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Cote Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Houghton County Road Commission in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Houghton County Road Commission averages 3.1 TCR (95% of the Plows, construction (e.g., excavating, grading), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Houghton County Road Commission TCR series: 2016=9.4 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Houghton County Road Commission falls in its industry

400 Plows, construction (e.g., exc establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 15 Plows, construction (e.g., exc employers in Michigan.

Houghton County Road Commission (44 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 87 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Houghton County Road Commission
Houghton County Road Commission (44 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 87 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Houghton County Road Commission has fewer employees than the Plows, construction (e.g., excavating, g median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 9.4 3.8 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333120 · MI · Hancock

400 Plows, construction (e.g., excavating, grading), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 12 employers in Hancock, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Cote Corporation 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR C.N. Wood 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR SMI Factory-Ohio 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tesmec USA, Inc. 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE NW Planning & Design Center 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE SEMCO Energy Gas Company - Macomb 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Genesee County Water & Waste Services 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Anthony Ragnone Treatment Plant 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPHS-Portage 584 FTE
CITY-NEAR Portage Hospital 487 FTE
CITY-NEAR Canal View~Houghton County 271 FTE
CITY-NEAR Portage Physician Practices Inc. 151 FTE
NAT-TCR Salvo Auto Parts Dundalk location 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Independent Refrigeration Services, Inc. 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR BelGioioso Cheese - Ledgeview 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR United Laboratories Manufacturing LLC 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Garden Way 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Staypineapple, The Loop Chicago 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Calvary Industries Pineville 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Renaissance 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.