Sewer cleaning and rodding services · California

Houston & Harris PCS, Inc.

Grand Terrace, CA · ~29 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.6
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Houston & Harris PCS, Inc. runs at 483% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Sewer cleaning and rodding services workplace, earning a grade F.

Houston & Harris PCS, Inc.: 12.6 TCR = 483% of Sewer cleaning and rodding services BLS 2.6 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Houston & Harris PCS, Inc. safety composite

Houston & Harris PCS, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.1

2017→2021

Houston & Harris PCS, Inc. injury rate improved

Houston & Harris PCS, Inc.'s TCR fell 6.1 from 12.5 in 2017 to 6.3 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 23.9 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=12.5 · 2018=23.9 · 2019=10.8 · 2020=9.4 · 2021=6.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562998 · Grand Terrace, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.6 · 483% of ind

  • DART 6.3 DART
  • RANK #8/8
  • PHOTO National Water Main …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: National Water Main Cleaning Company (Rocky Hill Division) (1.7 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Houston & Harris PCS, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Houston & Harris PCS, Inc. averages 12.6 TCR (483% of the Sewer cleaning and rodding services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Houston & Harris PCS, Inc. TCR series: 2017=12.5 · 2018=23.9 · 2019=10.8 · 2020=9.4 · 2021=6.3 · BLS 2.6

Where Houston & Harris PCS, Inc. falls in its industry

121 Sewer cleaning and rodding ser establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 8 Sewer cleaning and rodding ser employers in California.

Houston & Harris PCS, Inc. (29 employees, TCR 12.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Houston & Harris PCS, Inc.
Houston & Harris PCS, Inc. (29 employees, TCR 12.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Houston & Harris PCS, Inc. has fewer employees than the Sewer cleaning and rodding services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 6.3 6.3 2 0 0
2020 9.4 3.1 3 0 0
2019 10.8 7.2 3 0 0
2018 23.9 8.0 4 2 0
2017 12.5 4.2 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562998 · CA · Grand Terrace

121 Sewer cleaning and rodding services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 8 employers in Grand Terrace, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR National Water Main Cleaning Company (Rocky Hill Division) 10.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR R.K. Hydro-Vac, PA, Inc 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Best Pots Inc 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR National Water Main Cleaning Company (Utica Division) 8.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sean V. Doherty Farms 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blanco Farms, LLC 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SHOP 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cottonwood Farms 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR Grand Terrace Health Care Center 117 FTE
CITY-NEAR WCA Riverside 79 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-Vista Substation 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vista Blue Mountain 43 FTE
NAT-TCR LP New Port Richey, LLC -Southern Pines 12.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Buckeye Diamond Logistics - Norwood 12.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Shoals Ambulance 12.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Maple Park Village 12.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Burckhardt Compression (US) Inc. 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hoot Lake Plant 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE SFS Group USA - Durant 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE MPW - Location 6901 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.