General warehousing and storage · Texas

Houston Polymers Terminal

La Porte, TX · ~194 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Houston Polymers Terminal runs at 22% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade A.

Houston Polymers Terminal: 1.3 TCR = 22% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Houston Polymers Terminal safety composite

Houston Polymers Terminal scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2016→2024

Houston Polymers Terminal injury rate improved

Houston Polymers Terminal's TCR fell 1.1 from 1.8 in 2016 to 0.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.52× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.8 · 2017=2.3 · 2018=3.6 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=1.6 · 2021=0.5 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.4 · 2024=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · La Porte, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 22% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #175/846
  • PHOTO 50107 - CAPSTONE UNF…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~194 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 50107 - CAPSTONE UNFI SC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Houston Polymers Terminal in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Houston Polymers Terminal averages 1.3 TCR (22% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Houston Polymers Terminal TCR series: 2016=1.8 · 2017=2.3 · 2018=3.6 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=1.6 · 2021=0.5 · 2022=0 · 2023=0.4 · 2024=0.7 · BLS 5.8

Where Houston Polymers Terminal falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #175 safest of 846 General warehousing and storag employers in Texas.

Houston Polymers Terminal (194 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Houston Polymers Terminal
Houston Polymers Terminal (194 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Houston Polymers Terminal has more employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.7 0.7 2 0 0
2023 0.4 0.4 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.5 0.5 1 0 0
2020 1.6 1.6 4 0 0
2019 0.8 0.8 2 0 0
2018 3.6 2.4 9 0 0
2017 2.3 2.3 5 0 0
2016 1.8 1.4 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · TX · La Porte

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 170 employers in La Porte, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 50107 - CAPSTONE UNFI SC 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mooresville - 9440 South State Road 39 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Branch 7074 - WP Glenn Ave 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ryder PepsiCo Lockbourne 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE EL PASO TX SC N 194 FTE
STATE-SIZE Grandway West Office 194 FTE
STATE-SIZE Katy, TX (OPD Field) 194 FTE
STATE-SIZE Occidental OxyChem Ingleside TX 194 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stronghold, Ltd. 2,821 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stronghold Specialty, Ltd. 1,662 FTE
CITY-NEAR TURN 2 Specialty Companies 1,384 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dashiell Corp/Dacon Corp 973 FTE
NAT-TCR Wieland Metal Services, LLC 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Lotspeich Company, Inc. 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Bird Road 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Lester Electrical 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Belle River Power Plant 194 FTE
NAT-SIZE Whse Bsg 8997 Fresno Ca 194 FTE
NAT-SIZE USA FL Winter Haven DSC 194 FTE
NAT-SIZE MMR Constructors, Inc. - South Carolina Operations 194 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.