Trucking, general freight, long-distance, truckload (TL) · Texas

Houston Terminal

Houston, TX · ~188 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Houston Terminal runs at 36% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Trucking, general freight, long-distance, truckload (TL) workplace, earning a grade A.

Houston Terminal: 1.6 TCR = 36% of Trucking, general freight, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Houston Terminal safety composite

Houston Terminal scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Houston Terminal held a steady TCR band

Houston Terminal's TCR held near 0.0 from 1.1 in 2016 to 1.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 2.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.16× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.1 · 2017=1.6 · 2018=1.1 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484121 · Houston, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 36% of ind

  • DART 0.3 DART
  • RANK #89/297
  • PHOTO Harrisburg / Jonesto…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 37 inj
  • SIZE ~188 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Harrisburg / Jonestown Terminal (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Houston Terminal in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Houston Terminal averages 1.6 TCR (36% of the Trucking, general freight, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Houston Terminal TCR series: 2016=1.1 · 2017=1.6 · 2018=1.1 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=1.1 · BLS 4.5

Where Houston Terminal falls in its industry

3,252 Trucking, general freight, lon establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #89 safest of 297 Trucking, general freight, lon employers in Texas.

Houston Terminal (188 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Houston Terminal
Houston Terminal (188 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Houston Terminal has more employees than the Trucking, general freight, long-distance median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.1 0.3 4 0 0
2023 2.4 0.9 8 0 0
2022 1.6 0.6 5 0 0
2021 1.8 1.2 6 0 0
2020 1.9 0.6 3 0 0
2019 2.3 1.7 4 0 0
2018 1.1 1.1 2 0 0
2017 1.6 0.5 3 0 0
2016 1.1 0.5 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484121 · TX · Houston

3,252 Trucking, general freight, long-distance, truckload (TL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Harrisburg / Jonestown Terminal 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Osborn & Son Trucking Co., Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Clary Trucking Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR WM 6823 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kodiak Trenching & Boring, LLC 188 FTE
STATE-SIZE Quanta Infrastructure Solutions Group, LLC 188 FTE
STATE-SIZE Big Elm 188 FTE
STATE-SIZE GILCO CONTRACTING, INC. 188 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR Covington Store #607 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Kierland #553 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR UCO 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 444 Merrick Rd 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fisher Contracting Co. 188 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plant IT 188 FTE
NAT-SIZE Owens & Minor Carol Stream 188 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lockheed Martin Corporation FL-Crestview-Eglin AFB (5172) 188 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.