Wood Window and Door Manufacturing · Texas

Houston TX Windows

Houston, TX · ~562 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Houston TX Windows runs at 101% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Wood Window and Door Manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Houston TX Windows: 3.3 TCR = 101% of Wood Window and Door Manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Houston TX Windows safety composite

Houston TX Windows scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2016→2024

Houston TX Windows injury rate improved

Houston TX Windows's TCR fell 2.3 from 4.6 in 2016 to 2.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.61× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.6 · 2017=5.2 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=3.1 · 2021=3.2 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321911 · Houston, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.3 · 101% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #11/31
  • PHOTO Pella Corporation Ca…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 174 inj
  • SIZE ~562 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pella Corporation Carroll Site (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Houston TX Windows in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Houston TX Windows averages 3.3 TCR (101% of the Wood Window and Door Manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Houston TX Windows TCR series: 2016=4.6 · 2017=5.2 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=3.1 · 2021=3.2 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=2.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Houston TX Windows falls in its industry

452 Wood Window and Door Manufactu establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 31 Wood Window and Door Manufactu employers in Texas.

Houston TX Windows (562 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 97 employees and a TCR of 5.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Houston TX Windows
Houston TX Windows (562 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 97 employees and a TCR of 5.0

Houston TX Windows has more employees than the Wood Window and Door Manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.3 2.0 15 0 0
2023 2.3 1.6 13 0 0
2022 3.1 0.0 17 3 0
2021 3.2 0.7 20 2 0
2020 3.1 1.8 21 0 0
2019 2.5 1.7 16 0 0
2018 3.5 2.1 20 0 0
2017 5.2 3.6 29 0 0
2016 4.6 3.0 23 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321911 · TX · Houston

452 Wood Window and Door Manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pella Corporation Carroll Site 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Masonite Tampa Mfg. 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR AG Millworks Factory 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR FIVE LAKES MANUFACTURING 3.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Powerhouse Retail Services, LLC 562 FTE
STATE-SIZE Carthage Plant 562 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shell Oil Lubricants Supply Chain- Sales & Marketing 562 FTE
STATE-SIZE 434-DC434 562 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR Blairsville GA Yard 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Ramsey Constructors, Inc. 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Foodservice Florence - 0820 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR American Asphalt 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cermak Health Services of Cook County/Jtdc 562 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tioga Downs Racetrack LLC 562 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1849 - Atlantic Terminal 562 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southern Perishables Warehouse 562 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.