Fertilizers, mixed, made in plants not manufacturing fertilizer materials · Missouri

Howard Johnson's Enterprises

Neosho, MO · ~40 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Howard Johnson's Enterprises runs at 126% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Fertilizers, mixed, made in plants not manufacturing fertilizer materials workplace, earning a grade D.

Howard Johnson's Enterprises: 4.2 TCR = 126% of Fertilizers, mixed, made in plants not manufacturing fertilizer materials BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Howard Johnson's Enterprises safety composite

Howard Johnson's Enterprises scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Howard Johnson's Enterprises: 2.5 → 7.4 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 7.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.89× in 2024

Howard Johnson's Enterprises's TCR rose 5.0 from 2.5 in 2018 to 7.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 7.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.89× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325314 · Neosho, MO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.2 · 126% of ind

  • DART 3.7 DART
  • RANK #4/4
  • PHOTO Organic Recycling Inc.
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Organic Recycling Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Howard Johnson's Enterprises in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Howard Johnson's Enterprises averages 4.2 TCR (126% of the Fertilizers, mixed, made in plants not manufacturing fertilizer materials BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Howard Johnson's Enterprises TCR series: 2018=2.5 · 2019=7.5 · 2020=5.2 · 2021=0 · 2022=3 · 2023=3.7 · 2024=7.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Howard Johnson's Enterprises falls in its industry

163 Fertilizers, mixed, made in pl establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 4 Fertilizers, mixed, made in pl employers in Missouri.

Howard Johnson's Enterprises (40 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Howard Johnson's Enterprises
Howard Johnson's Enterprises (40 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Howard Johnson's Enterprises has fewer employees than the Fertilizers, mixed, made in plants not m median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.4 3.7 2 0 0
2023 3.7 0.0 1 0 0
2022 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 5.2 5.2 2 0 0
2019 7.5 7.5 3 0 0
2018 2.5 2.5 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325314 · MO · Neosho

163 Fertilizers, mixed, made in plants not manufacturing fertilizer materials employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 53 employers in Neosho, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Organic Recycling Inc. 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jiffy Products of America 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Atlas Peat & Soil, Superior Mulch, Yard Improvements 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Easy Gardener, Inc. 4.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE George's Cassville Hatchery 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE 027 - Dorsett 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE 070 - Jefferson 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Berkeley 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR La-Z-Boy Midwest 798 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 17 388 FTE
CITY-NEAR 17 356 FTE
CITY-NEAR Neosho Distribution Center & Warehouse 337 FTE
NAT-TCR D L Gasser Construction 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Eliza Jennings Home 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Kalispell Plywood 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR T&H Electrical Corp. 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE RDH Mechanical Contractors, Inc. 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Boise Hampton Inn & Suites 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Knapp Concrete Contractors, Inc. 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Calzone Case Company 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.