Foundries (except die-casting), nonferrous metals (except aluminum) · New Jersey

Howmet - Dover Alloy

Dover, NJ · ~132 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Howmet - Dover Alloy runs at 61% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Foundries (except die-casting), nonferrous metals (except aluminum) workplace, earning a grade B.

Howmet - Dover Alloy: 2.0 TCR = 61% of Foundries (except die-casting), nonferrous metals (except aluminum) BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Howmet - Dover Alloy safety composite

Howmet - Dover Alloy scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.9

2016→2024

Howmet - Dover Alloy injury rate improved

Howmet - Dover Alloy's TCR fell 0.9 from 3.5 in 2016 to 2.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.5 · 2017=1.8 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=1.7 · 2020=0.8 · 2021=1.7 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=2.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331529 · Dover, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 61% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #2/5
  • PHOTO Excal-Inc.
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~132 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Excal-Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Howmet - Dover Alloy in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Howmet - Dover Alloy averages 2.0 TCR (61% of the Foundries (except die-casting), nonferrous metals (except aluminum) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Howmet - Dover Alloy TCR series: 2016=3.5 · 2017=1.8 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=1.7 · 2020=0.8 · 2021=1.7 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=2.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Howmet - Dover Alloy falls in its industry

124 Foundries (except die-casting) establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 5 Foundries (except die-casting) employers in New Jersey.

Howmet - Dover Alloy (132 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 5.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Howmet - Dover Alloy
Howmet - Dover Alloy (132 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 5.4

Howmet - Dover Alloy has more employees than the Foundries (except die-casting), nonferro median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.6 0.6 4 0 0
2023 2.3 0.8 3 0 0
2022 0.8 0.0 0 1 0
2021 1.7 0.9 2 0 0
2020 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2019 1.7 0.6 2 1 0
2018 2.9 0.6 5 0 0
2017 1.8 0.6 3 0 0
2016 3.5 1.4 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331529 · NJ · Dover

124 Foundries (except die-casting), nonferrous metals (except aluminum) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 33 employers in Dover, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Excal-Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Matthews International Corporation - Pittsburgh Bronze 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR PCC Structurals Inc 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chromalloy Castings Tampa 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Englewood Stratas Food 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE NJP 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE ALAM Branchburg 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE Solvay West Deptford, NJ 132 FTE
CITY-NEAR Howmet - Dover Casting 675 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Clare's Dover Hospital 625 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Clares Dover Hospital 471 FTE
CITY-NEAR Zufall Health 351 FTE
NAT-TCR Master Craft Boats 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR ACCO Brands - Alexandria 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Patella's Floor Center, Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Willow Bend #307 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Avera Brady Health and Rehab 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE XNW 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ocala RPC 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE J.W. Harris Co. Inc. - Gainesville 132 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.