Bolts, metal, manufacturing · California

Howmet Global Fastening Systems Inc

Fullerton, CA · ~459 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Howmet Global Fastening Systems Inc runs at 22% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Bolts, metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Howmet Global Fastening Systems Inc: 0.7 TCR = 22% of Bolts, metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Howmet Global Fastening Systems Inc safety composite

Howmet Global Fastening Systems Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Howmet Global Fastening Systems Inc held a steady TCR band

Howmet Global Fastening Systems Inc's TCR held near 0.1 from 0.9 in 2021 to 0.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 1.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.22× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=0.9 · 2022=0.4 · 2023=1.0 · 2024=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332722 · Fullerton, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 22% of ind

  • DART 0.2 DART
  • RANK #6/42
  • PHOTO T&T Enterprises Inc
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~459 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: T&T Enterprises Inc (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Howmet Global Fastening Systems Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Howmet Global Fastening Systems Inc averages 0.7 TCR (22% of the Bolts, metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Howmet Global Fastening Systems Inc TCR series: 2021=0.9 · 2022=0.4 · 2023=1 · 2024=0.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Howmet Global Fastening Systems Inc falls in its industry

335 Bolts, metal, manufacturing establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 42 Bolts, metal, manufacturing employers in California.

Howmet Global Fastening Systems Inc (459 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 80 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Howmet Global Fastening Systems Inc
Howmet Global Fastening Systems Inc (459 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 80 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Howmet Global Fastening Systems Inc has more employees than the Bolts, metal, manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.8 0.2 3 2 0
2023 1.0 0.3 6 0 0
2022 0.4 0.0 2 0 0
2021 0.9 0.2 3 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332722 · CA · Fullerton

335 Bolts, metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 167 employers in Fullerton, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR T&T Enterprises Inc 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Foundation Systems & Anchors 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ohio Nut & Bolt Company 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR John Hassall 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Level 5, Inc. 459 FTE
STATE-SIZE PacSci EMC Hollister 459 FTE
STATE-SIZE YYK Enterprises Operations, LLC 459 FTE
STATE-SIZE GSI-1 Monterey Park 459 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA692 ST JUDE MEDICAL CENTER HR 2,718 FTE
CITY-NEAR SASCO 705 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Fullerton 692 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fullerton / Orange 636 FTE
NAT-TCR Berry Global - McAlester, OK 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Lifespan Corporation 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Shelly Materials, Inc. - Liquid Division 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR The Shelly Company - Southern Division HMA 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE J&J Snack Foods Corp Bellmawr 459 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - DLT3 459 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hawesville 459 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sig Sauer (Exeter) 459 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.