Nonferrous metals (except aluminum) foundries (except die-casting) · Michigan

Howmet - Whitehall HRC Complex

Whitehall, MI · ~173 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Howmet - Whitehall HRC Complex runs at 24% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Nonferrous metals (except aluminum) foundries (except die-casting) workplace, earning a grade A.

Howmet - Whitehall HRC Complex: 0.8 TCR = 24% of Nonferrous metals (except aluminum) foundries (except die-casting) BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Howmet - Whitehall HRC Complex safety composite

Howmet - Whitehall HRC Complex scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2016→2017

Howmet - Whitehall HRC Complex injury rate improved

Howmet - Whitehall HRC Complex's TCR fell 1.6 from 1.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.6 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.6 · 2017=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331529 · Whitehall, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 24% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #11/21
  • PHOTO Arconic Whitehall Op…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~173 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Arconic Whitehall Operations - Whitehall Plant 5 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Howmet - Whitehall HRC Complex in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Howmet - Whitehall HRC Complex averages 0.8 TCR (24% of the Nonferrous metals (except aluminum) foundries (except die-casting) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Howmet - Whitehall HRC Complex TCR series: 2016=1.6 · 2017=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Howmet - Whitehall HRC Complex falls in its industry

124 Nonferrous metals (except alum establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 21 Nonferrous metals (except alum employers in Michigan.

Howmet - Whitehall HRC Complex (173 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 5.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Howmet - Whitehall HRC Complex
Howmet - Whitehall HRC Complex (173 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 5.4

Howmet - Whitehall HRC Complex has more employees than the Nonferrous metals (except aluminum) foun median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 1.6 0.0 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331529 · MI · Whitehall

124 Nonferrous metals (except aluminum) foundries (except die-casting) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 36 employers in Whitehall, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Arconic Whitehall Operations - Whitehall Plant 5 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Howmet Aerospace Whitehall Operations- Whitehall Castings Plant 1 and 3 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Howmet - Whitehall Castings Plant 1 and 3 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR OSHA Log LMA 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE City of Detroit Department of Public Works - Street Maintenance Division 173 FTE
STATE-SIZE LGC Global, Inc. 173 FTE
STATE-SIZE Salt-St. Clair 173 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kentwood Packaging Corp 173 FTE
CITY-NEAR Arconic Whitehall Operations- Whitehall Castings Plant 1 and 3 1,027 FTE
CITY-NEAR Arconic Whitehall Operations - Whitehall Casting Plant 10 613 FTE
CITY-NEAR Howmet Aerospace Whitehall Operations - Whitehall Casting Plant 10 579 FTE
CITY-NEAR Howmet - Whitehall Casting Plant 10 524 FTE
NAT-TCR Clean Venture - Elizabeth Ops 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Green Lake Tube LLC 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Wagner Industrial Electric 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR MS - Carlsbad, NM - 1CANM 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Westin Buckhead Atlanta 173 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rochester (Nyroc) 173 FTE
NAT-SIZE Paducah (Kypad) 173 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hiawatha (Iahia) 173 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.