Nonferrous metals (except aluminum) foundries (except die-casting) · Michigan

Howmet - Whitehall Information Technology

Whitehall, MI · ~39 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Howmet - Whitehall Information Technology runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Nonferrous metals (except aluminum) foundries (except die-casting) workplace, earning a grade C.

Howmet - Whitehall Information Technology: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Nonferrous metals (except aluminum) foundries (except die-casting) BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Howmet - Whitehall Information Technology safety composite

Howmet - Whitehall Information Technology scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

83/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Howmet - Whitehall Information Technology held a steady TCR band

Howmet - Whitehall Information Technology's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.0 TCR.

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331529 · Whitehall, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/21
  • PHOTO Howmet Aerospace Whi…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Howmet Aerospace Whitehall Operations - HRC Complex (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Howmet - Whitehall Information Technology in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Howmet - Whitehall Information Technology averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Nonferrous metals (except aluminum) foundries (except die-casting) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Howmet - Whitehall Information Technology TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Howmet - Whitehall Information Technology falls in its industry

124 Nonferrous metals (except alum establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 21 Nonferrous metals (except alum employers in Michigan.

Howmet - Whitehall Information Technology (39 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 5.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Howmet - Whitehall Information Technology
Howmet - Whitehall Information Technology (39 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 5.4

Howmet - Whitehall Information Technology has fewer employees than the Nonferrous metals (except aluminum) foun median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331529 · MI · Whitehall

124 Nonferrous metals (except aluminum) foundries (except die-casting) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 36 employers in Whitehall, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Howmet Aerospace Whitehall Operations - HRC Complex 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arconic Whitehall Operations - Whitehall Casting Plant 10 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Howmet - Whitehall Corporate 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR OSHA Log DDC 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mount Hope Dairy 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE CFI - Livonia 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dart Facilities 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cripps Fontaine Excavating, INC 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR Arconic Whitehall Operations- Whitehall Castings Plant 1 and 3 1,027 FTE
CITY-NEAR Howmet Aerospace Whitehall Operations- Whitehall Castings Plant 1 and 3 948 FTE
CITY-NEAR Howmet - Whitehall Castings Plant 1 and 3 881 FTE
CITY-NEAR Howmet Aerospace Whitehall Operations - Whitehall Casting Plant 10 579 FTE
NAT-TCR Aviation Other : Virtual Employee Roll-Up Site 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR AZ-01 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR CT-02 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR NJ-05 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rai Mx Ewr 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE N and R of Gerald Inc 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Textron Specialized Vehicles - Premier De-icers 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Russ Darrow LLC 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.