Building materials supply dealers · New York

H&P Lumber and Materials, Inc

Goldens Bridge, NY · ~24 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.4
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

H&P Lumber and Materials, Inc runs at 188% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Building materials supply dealers workplace, earning a grade D.

H&P Lumber and Materials, Inc: 6.4 TCR = 188% of Building materials supply dealers BLS 3.4 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

H&P Lumber and Materials, Inc safety composite

H&P Lumber and Materials, Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−12.7

2016→2024

H&P Lumber and Materials, Inc injury rate improved

H&P Lumber and Materials, Inc's TCR fell 12.7 from 16.9 in 2016 to 4.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 16.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.66× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=16.9 · 2017=4.3 · 2019=8.6 · 2020=4.5 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=12.7 · 2024=4.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 444190 · Goldens Bridge, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.4 · 188% of ind

  • DART 4.2 DART
  • RANK #42/65
  • PHOTO United Builders Supp…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: United Builders Supply Co., Inc.-Niantic (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

H&P Lumber and Materials, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows H&P Lumber and Materials, Inc averages 6.4 TCR (188% of the Building materials supply dealers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

H&P Lumber and Materials, Inc TCR series: 2016=16.9 · 2017=4.3 · 2019=8.6 · 2020=4.5 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=12.7 · 2024=4.2 · BLS 3.4

Where H&P Lumber and Materials, Inc falls in its industry

1,643 Building materials supply deal establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #42 safest of 65 Building materials supply deal employers in New York.

H&P Lumber and Materials, Inc (24 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 35 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate H&P Lumber and Materials, Inc
H&P Lumber and Materials, Inc (24 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 35 employees and a TCR of 5.2

H&P Lumber and Materials, Inc has fewer employees than the Building materials supply dealers median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.2 4.2 1 0 0
2023 12.7 8.4 3 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 4.5 4.5 1 0 0
2019 8.6 8.6 2 0 0
2017 4.3 0.0 1 0 0
2016 16.9 0.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

444190 · NY · Goldens Bridge

1,643 Building materials supply dealers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 4 employers in Goldens Bridge, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR United Builders Supply Co., Inc.-Niantic 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wilke Window & Door 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Custom Bilt Cabinet and Supply 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR CA303A 6.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bittner Singer Orchards 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wegmans Organic Farm 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lawnel Farms 2 LLC 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dairy 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5472-000002424 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5472-NAI-0034-0034-02424 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR NAI-0034-0034-02424 FAC-02424-GOLDENS BRIDGE-NY 43 FTE
NAT-TCR Regency Hospital of Columbus LLC (d/b/a Select Specialty Hospital - Columbus South) 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Pepsi-Cola Champaign-Urbana Bottling Co. 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Byford Machine-Tool, Inc. 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR The Windsor of Cape Coral 6.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE BEI Hilliard Branch 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plasmine Technology, Inc. Bay Minette, AL Plant 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plum Corporation 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Veteran - Hendricks Rd. 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.