Switches for electronic applications manufacturing · Oklahoma

HSI Sensing

Chickasha, OK · ~167 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities

The verdict

HSI Sensing runs at 65% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Switches for electronic applications manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
avg TCR · per 100 workers
3.3
industry benchmark (BLS)
10
recordable injuries tracked

Grade compares HSI Sensing's OSHA Total Case Rate to the BLS industry benchmark across 3 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). This reflects reported recordable injuries, not an independent safety inspection -- underreporting is a known limitation of employer self-recordkeeping.

Injury rate over time

HSI Sensing's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.3 industry benchmark.

11.522.533.5 201620182019 2.43.3 Industry benchmarkHSI Sensing TCR
Total Case Rate (recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers), OSHA ITA Form 300A. Industry benchmark: BLS IIF, NAICS 334419.

Where HSI Sensing falls in its industry

404 Switches for electronic applic establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

HSI Sensing has an average TCR of 2.1, which is 65% of the industry average (3.3) for Switches for electronic applications manufacturing. This is better than average.

The letter grade is a transparent derived index PlainSafetyScore computes from public OSHA ITA and BLS benchmark data, not an official OSHA rating or safety certification. Full formula and thresholds: Methodology.

Trend analysis for HSI Sensing

Between 2016 and 2019, HSI Sensing's Total Case Rate held roughly steady from 2.5 to 2.4 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 3% decrease across 3 years of OSHA reporting.

The safest year on record was 2018, at a TCR of 1.5, while 2016 saw the highest rate, at 2.5, a spread of 1.0 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a comparatively narrow spread, suggesting a fairly consistent safety record across the 3 years with a usable rate on file, rather than one outlier year skewing the multi-year average.

Summed across those 3 reporting years, HSI Sensing recorded 10 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 3-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.

Verify This Employer with OSHA

All injury, illness, and fatality figures on this page are sourced from HSI Sensing's own mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.

Verify on OSHA Establishment Search

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 334419 - Switches for electronic applications manufacturing.

DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2019)

DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.

3 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 331,279 hours worked = 1.81 DART

Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping

Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State

Benchmark TCR Source
HSI Sensing (this establishment) 2.13 OSHA ITA Form 300A, 3-year avg
Tubes, electronic, manufacturing industry avg 3.30 BLS IIF, NAICS 334419
Oklahoma state avg (all industries) 4.32 OSHA ITA, state-level rollup

Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program

Reportable Incident Timeline

Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by HSI Sensing to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.

Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 2.4 1.8 4 0 0
2018 1.5 0.8 2 0 0
2016 2.5 0.6 4 0 0

What this grade means for you

Use this grade as a relative read on HSI Sensing's reported OSHA injury record, strong versus its Switches for electronic applications manufacturing peers, but not a guarantee about any single site today.

  • At 65% of the Switches for electronic applications manufacturing benchmark, HSI Sensing reports fewer injuries than typical peers, still worth asking how safety is managed day to day. Know your rights
  • Judge this record against the wider Switches for electronic applications manufacturing sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
  • Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another

Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is HSI Sensing's safety grade?
HSI Sensing has a safety grade of B (Good Safety Record). This grade is based on their average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 2.1 compared to the BLS industry benchmark of 3.3 for Switches for electronic applications manufacturing.
How many injuries has HSI Sensing reported?
HSI Sensing has reported 10 total injuries and 0 fatalities across 3 years of OSHA data (2019, 2018, 2016). This data comes from mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reports.

Similar Employers

Matched by safety record across the industry and by workforce size within Oklahoma - a different peer set than the category browse links below.

Explore More Safety Data

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.