Cartons, folding (except milk), made from purchased paperboard · New York

HSM Packaging

Liverpool, NY · ~69 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

HSM Packaging runs at 143% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Cartons, folding (except milk), made from purchased paperboard workplace, earning a grade D.

HSM Packaging: 4.7 TCR = 143% of Cartons, folding (except milk), made from purchased paperboard BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

HSM Packaging safety composite

HSM Packaging scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

HSM Packaging: 2.7 → 4.2 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 10.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

HSM Packaging's TCR rose 1.5 from 2.7 in 2016 to 4.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 10.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322212 · Liverpool, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.7 · 143% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #14/14
  • PHOTO Royal Paper Box Co.
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~69 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Royal Paper Box Co. (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

HSM Packaging in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows HSM Packaging averages 4.7 TCR (143% of the Cartons, folding (except milk), made from purchased paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

HSM Packaging TCR series: 2016=2.7 · 2017=2.9 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=4.6 · 2020=3.8 · 2021=4.4 · 2022=10.3 · 2023=7.8 · 2024=4.2 · BLS 3.3

Where HSM Packaging falls in its industry

205 Cartons, folding (except milk) establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 14 Cartons, folding (except milk) employers in New York.

HSM Packaging (69 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 133 employees and a TCR of 2.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate HSM Packaging
HSM Packaging (69 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 133 employees and a TCR of 2.2

HSM Packaging has fewer employees than the Cartons, folding (except milk), made fro median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.2 0.0 2 0 0
2023 7.8 0.0 4 0 0
2022 10.3 2.9 7 0 0
2021 4.4 0.0 3 0 0
2020 3.8 0.0 3 0 0
2019 4.6 3.1 3 0 0
2018 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2017 2.9 2.9 2 0 0
2016 2.7 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322212 · NY · Liverpool

205 Cartons, folding (except milk), made from purchased paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 141 employers in Liverpool, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Royal Paper Box Co. 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Colbert Packaging Corporation - Lake Forest 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Thoro Packaging 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2453-00060343-60343 4.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Marks Farms 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dairy Farm 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE R L Baxter Building 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Silverlining Interiors 69 FTE
CITY-NEAR Raymour & Flanigan Furniture 6,273 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US NY Syracuse Electroncs Pkwy (1021) 2,126 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Syracuse Campus (1021) 1,537 FTE
CITY-NEAR Advocates Incorporated 1,030 FTE
NAT-TCR Kingsbury Castings 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Select Specialty Hospital - Pontiac, Inc 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Manchester Industries Richmond 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Enterprise Rent-A-Car (Pensacola Remarketing - 55RP) 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Asbestos 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heritage Hall Brookneal 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Laverdiere Construction, Inc. 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Fort Valley State University 69 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.