Industrial chemicals merchant wholesalers · South Carolina

Hubbard-Hall, Inman

Inman, SC · ~29 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hubbard-Hall, Inman runs at 21% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Industrial chemicals merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade A.

Hubbard-Hall, Inman: 0.5 TCR = 21% of Industrial chemicals merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hubbard-Hall, Inman safety composite

Hubbard-Hall, Inman scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Hubbard-Hall, Inman held a steady TCR band

Hubbard-Hall, Inman's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 4.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=4.1 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424690 · Inman, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 21% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/12
  • PHOTO Alexander Chemical C…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Alexander Chemical Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Hubbard-Hall, Inman in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hubbard-Hall, Inman averages 0.5 TCR (21% of the Industrial chemicals merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hubbard-Hall, Inman TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=4.1 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.2

Where Hubbard-Hall, Inman falls in its industry

766 Industrial chemicals merchant establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 12 Industrial chemicals merchant employers in South Carolina.

Hubbard-Hall, Inman (29 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Hubbard-Hall, Inman
Hubbard-Hall, Inman (29 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Hubbard-Hall, Inman has fewer employees than the Industrial chemicals merchant wholesaler median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.1 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424690 · SC · Inman

766 Industrial chemicals merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 29 employers in Inman, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Alexander Chemical Corporation 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR LaPorte Hydrocarbon Mix Plant 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR George S. Coyne Chemical Co., Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chicago CB 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE MT PLEASANT CREW QUARTERS 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ni Pacolet Milliken 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Charleston Division 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE 32328 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR Enoree Complex 365 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mack Molding Company - Inman, SC 289 FTE
CITY-NEAR SAYBROOK PLANT 263 FTE
CITY-NEAR IWG High Performance Conductors - Inman 248 FTE
NAT-TCR Jackson Rubbermaid 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Addis 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR IntegraCare 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR San Bernardino- Dry Bulk Transport 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Trojan 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plant 1 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Genesee Lumber Company, Inc. 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - Troy 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.