Bonded warehousing, general merchandise · California

Hubbell Ontario Distribution Center

Ontario, CA · ~56 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hubbell Ontario Distribution Center runs at 24% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Bonded warehousing, general merchandise workplace, earning a grade A.

Hubbell Ontario Distribution Center: 1.4 TCR = 24% of Bonded warehousing, general merchandise BLS 5.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hubbell Ontario Distribution Center safety composite

Hubbell Ontario Distribution Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.8

2020→2024

Hubbell Ontario Distribution Center injury rate improved

Hubbell Ontario Distribution Center's TCR fell 4.8 from 4.8 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 4.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=4.8 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=2.1 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Ontario, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 24% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #144/1131
  • PHOTO USA GA Buford DSC
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~56 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: USA GA Buford DSC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Hubbell Ontario Distribution Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hubbell Ontario Distribution Center averages 1.4 TCR (24% of the Bonded warehousing, general merchandise BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hubbell Ontario Distribution Center TCR series: 2020=4.8 · 2021=0 · 2022=2.1 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 5.8

Where Hubbell Ontario Distribution Center falls in its industry

9,477 Bonded warehousing, general me establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #144 safest of 1131 Bonded warehousing, general me employers in California.

Hubbell Ontario Distribution Center (56 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Hubbell Ontario Distribution Center
Hubbell Ontario Distribution Center (56 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Hubbell Ontario Distribution Center has fewer employees than the Bonded warehousing, general merchandise median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 4.8 4.8 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · CA · Ontario

9,477 Bonded warehousing, general merchandise employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 599 employers in Ontario, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR USA GA Buford DSC 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Deluxe Freight, LLC 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 60562 - CAPSTONE SYSCO CENTRAL 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR INTERFACE FLOR LLC - WAREHOUSE 19 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wallace Brothers 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Sun Farms, Inc 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1624 Poole Blvd., Yuba City, CA 95993 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Copperhill 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prime Healthcare Services Inc. Location: St. Mary's, Passaic LLC 46-3499370 (HP29) 10,997 FTE
CITY-NEAR CAONA - ONTARIO HUB 4,372 FTE
CITY-NEAR ONTARIO HUB (CAONA) 3,354 FTE
CITY-NEAR Atlantic Solutions Group Inc, Inc. DBA Empire Workforce Solutions 3,240 FTE
NAT-TCR USA Central 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR PRx Performance LLC 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Mediacom's Loxley, AL 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Cardinal Civil Contracting NC, LLC 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE AA Metals Inc 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE 451 Pepsi Road 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Unholtz-Dickie Corporation 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE ACS Steel Company, LLC 56 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.