Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing · Tennessee

Hughes Parker Ind. Plant 3

Manchester, TN · ~14 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hughes Parker Ind. Plant 3 runs at 61% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Hughes Parker Ind. Plant 3: 2.0 TCR = 61% of Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hughes Parker Ind. Plant 3 safety composite

Hughes Parker Ind. Plant 3 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Hughes Parker Ind. Plant 3: 4.7 → 7.9 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 7.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Hughes Parker Ind. Plant 3's TCR rose 3.2 from 4.7 in 2016 to 7.9 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332119 · Manchester, TN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 61% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/11
  • PHOTO Leader Tech Inc.
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~14 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Leader Tech Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Hughes Parker Ind. Plant 3 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hughes Parker Ind. Plant 3 averages 2.0 TCR (61% of the Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hughes Parker Ind. Plant 3 TCR series: 2016=4.7 · 2017=0 · 2018=5.4 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=7.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Hughes Parker Ind. Plant 3 falls in its industry

477 Metal stampings (except automo establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 11 Metal stampings (except automo employers in Tennessee.

Hughes Parker Ind. Plant 3 (14 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Hughes Parker Ind. Plant 3
Hughes Parker Ind. Plant 3 (14 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Hughes Parker Ind. Plant 3 has fewer employees than the Metal stampings (except automotive, cans median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.9 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 5.4 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 4.7 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332119 · TN · Manchester

477 Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 43 employers in Manchester, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Leader Tech Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Precision Stamping Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR HK Metalcraft Manufacturing Corporation - Headquarters 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR CS Cosmos STIHL Mfg Inc 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Oak Grove Gin & Warehouse, LLC 14 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wright Contracting, Inc 14 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southeastern Coatings, Inc 14 FTE
STATE-SIZE Thompson Industrial Services, LLC, Division 15 14 FTE
CITY-NEAR Manchester / Smyrna 971 FTE
CITY-NEAR Viam Manufacturing, Inc. 523 FTE
CITY-NEAR Great Lakes Cheese Company, Inc. - Manchester 475 FTE
CITY-NEAR Great Lakes Cheese of Tennessee, Inc. 361 FTE
NAT-TCR Foti Contracting LLC 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Trucare Living Centers - Columbus 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Lake Charles Terminal 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR CAPS Orlando 2.0 TCR

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.