Extruded, molded or lathe-cut rubber goods manufacturing · Wisconsin

Humane Manufacturing Company, LLC

Janesville, WI · ~69 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Humane Manufacturing Company, LLC runs at 304% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Extruded, molded or lathe-cut rubber goods manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Humane Manufacturing Company, LLC: 10.0 TCR = 304% of Extruded, molded or lathe-cut rubber goods manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Humane Manufacturing Company, LLC safety composite

Humane Manufacturing Company, LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.7

2022→2024

Humane Manufacturing Company, LLC injury rate improved

Humane Manufacturing Company, LLC's TCR fell 10.7 from 15.4 in 2022 to 4.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 15.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.15× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=15.4 · 2024=4.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326291 · Janesville, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.0 · 304% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #16/16
  • PHOTO Mullins Rubber Produ…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~69 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mullins Rubber Products, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Humane Manufacturing Company, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Humane Manufacturing Company, LLC averages 10.0 TCR (304% of the Extruded, molded or lathe-cut rubber goods manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Humane Manufacturing Company, LLC TCR series: 2022=15.4 · 2024=4.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Humane Manufacturing Company, LLC falls in its industry

266 Extruded, molded or lathe-cut establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 16 Extruded, molded or lathe-cut employers in Wisconsin.

Humane Manufacturing Company, LLC (69 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Humane Manufacturing Company, LLC
Humane Manufacturing Company, LLC (69 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 3.6

Humane Manufacturing Company, LLC has fewer employees than the Extruded, molded or lathe-cut rubber goo median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.7 1.6 3 0 0
2022 15.4 12.8 10 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326291 · WI · Janesville

266 Extruded, molded or lathe-cut rubber goods manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 178 employers in Janesville, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mullins Rubber Products, Inc 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Scougal Rubber Corporation 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR GRRP 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Humane Manufacturing HQ (Janesville) 9.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pewaukee Central Stores 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Metro North 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jack Walters & Sons Corp. - Allenton 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Equix Energy, Inc. - TX 69 FTE
CITY-NEAR Service Center Operations : 0780 1,158 FTE
CITY-NEAR US - Supply Chain : 0780 1,087 FTE
CITY-NEAR 780 - JANESVILLE, WI 964 FTE
CITY-NEAR Seneca Foods Corporation 650 FTE
NAT-TCR Sacramento Horizon 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Mazza Recycling Services Ltd. 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Daikin Comfort Technologies - City of Industry 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Parkway School District 10.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE PM1 Pompano Beach Service Center 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pw Snf LLC 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE F & B LLC 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE AllPro Restoration & Janitorial 69 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.