Apartment building rental or leasing · California

Hunt Enterprises, Inc.

Lawndale, CA · ~193 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hunt Enterprises, Inc. runs at 377% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Apartment building rental or leasing workplace, earning a grade F.

Hunt Enterprises, Inc.: 5.3 TCR = 377% of Apartment building rental or leasing BLS 1.4 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hunt Enterprises, Inc. safety composite

Hunt Enterprises, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2017→2024

Hunt Enterprises, Inc. injury rate improved

Hunt Enterprises, Inc.'s TCR fell 2.0 from 7.2 in 2017 to 5.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 7.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.99× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=7.2 · 2018=5.3 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=4.0 · 2021=6.4 · 2022=7.1 · 2023=4.1 · 2024=5.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 531110 · Lawndale, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 5.3 · 377% of ind

  • DART 5.2 DART
  • RANK #62/113
  • PHOTO Oakcrest Towers
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 69 inj
  • SIZE ~193 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Oakcrest Towers (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Hunt Enterprises, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hunt Enterprises, Inc. averages 5.3 TCR (377% of the Apartment building rental or leasing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hunt Enterprises, Inc. TCR series: 2017=7.2 · 2018=5.3 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=4 · 2021=6.4 · 2022=7.1 · 2023=4.1 · 2024=5.2 · BLS 1.4

Where Hunt Enterprises, Inc. falls in its industry

1,100 Apartment building rental or l establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #62 safest of 113 Apartment building rental or l employers in California.

Hunt Enterprises, Inc. (193 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Hunt Enterprises, Inc.
Hunt Enterprises, Inc. (193 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Hunt Enterprises, Inc. has more employees than the Apartment building rental or leasing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.2 5.2 7 1 0
2023 4.1 4.1 7 0 0
2022 7.1 3.0 11 1 0
2021 6.4 2.9 11 0 0
2020 4.0 4.0 8 0 0
2019 2.9 2.9 5 1 0
2018 5.3 5.3 9 1 0
2017 7.2 6.6 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

531110 · CA · Lawndale

1,100 Apartment building rental or leasing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 17 employers in Lawndale, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Oakcrest Towers 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR FirstKey Homes LLC - Indianapolis 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Federal Payroll LLC 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Low Consolidation 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE George Chiala Farms - Hollister 193 FTE
STATE-SIZE Primavera Ag Services 193 FTE
STATE-SIZE CA-Covina S/C 193 FTE
STATE-SIZE Building Maintenance 193 FTE
CITY-NEAR Division 22 137 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lawndale Healthcare & Wellness Center 104 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3336 - Lawndale Hawthorne Blvd 83 FTE
CITY-NEAR el super #43 lawndale 83 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Ncc Main Campus Food Court 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Cape Romain Contractors 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR UMLasPalmas924 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Paramount Contracting, Inc. 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE MD&A Headquarters & Outage Services Division 193 FTE
NAT-SIZE ShopRite of Bridge and Harbison 193 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gully Transportation, Inc. 193 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sparks 193 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.