Concrete paving (i.e., highway, road, street, public sidewalk) · Arizona

Hunter Contracting Co.

Gilbert, AZ · ~408 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hunter Contracting Co. runs at 93% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Concrete paving (i.e., highway, road, street, public sidewalk) workplace, earning a grade C.

Hunter Contracting Co.: 2.6 TCR = 93% of Concrete paving (i.e., highway, road, street, public sidewalk) BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hunter Contracting Co. safety composite

Hunter Contracting Co. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 56% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.5

2016→2024

Hunter Contracting Co. injury rate improved

Hunter Contracting Co.'s TCR fell 3.5 from 4.8 in 2016 to 1.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.8 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=3.9 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=1.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Gilbert, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.6 · 93% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #30/63
  • PHOTO South Carolina
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 67 inj
  • SIZE ~408 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: South Carolina (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Hunter Contracting Co. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hunter Contracting Co. averages 2.6 TCR (93% of the Concrete paving (i.e., highway, road, street, public sidewalk) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hunter Contracting Co. TCR series: 2016=4.8 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=3.9 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=1.4 · BLS 2.8

Where Hunter Contracting Co. falls in its industry

4,078 Concrete paving (i.e., highway establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #30 safest of 63 Concrete paving (i.e., highway employers in Arizona.

Hunter Contracting Co. (408 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Hunter Contracting Co.
Hunter Contracting Co. (408 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Hunter Contracting Co. has more employees than the Concrete paving (i.e., highway, road, st median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.4 1.0 6 2 0
2023 1.4 0.8 6 1 0
2022 2.4 1.2 9 1 0
2021 3.9 2.4 12 1 0
2020 2.2 1.3 7 0 0
2019 2.1 1.5 7 0 0
2018 2.6 2.3 8 0 0
2016 4.8 2.8 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · AZ · Gilbert

4,078 Concrete paving (i.e., highway, road, street, public sidewalk) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 261 employers in Gilbert, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR South Carolina 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Road and Highway Builders 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR George & Lynch, Inc. 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Street 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE City of Tempe Public Works Department 408 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3465 407 FTE
STATE-SIZE Scottsdale Golf Group 409 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4021-500039100 407 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030512 1,613 FTE
CITY-NEAR Town of Gilbert 1,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2643-64030512-512001 1,286 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ono-512 911 FTE
NAT-TCR Pasco Inc 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Flowers Baking Company of Bardstown 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Galaxy Tulare LP 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Fury Ford Waconia 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Minneapolis College of Art and Design 408 FTE
NAT-SIZE Minnesota House of Representatives 408 FTE
NAT-SIZE Columbus Corn Plant 408 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - SDC1 408 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.