Tire mounting machines, motor vehicle, manufacturing · Missouri

Hunter Engineering Company - Headquarters

Bridgeton, MO · ~340 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hunter Engineering Company - Headquarters runs at 74% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Tire mounting machines, motor vehicle, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Hunter Engineering Company - Headquarters: 2.4 TCR = 74% of Tire mounting machines, motor vehicle, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hunter Engineering Company - Headquarters safety composite

Hunter Engineering Company - Headquarters scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2016→2017

Hunter Engineering Company - Headquarters injury rate improved

Hunter Engineering Company - Headquarters's TCR fell 0.7 from 2.8 in 2016 to 2.1 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.8 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.8 · 2017=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333318 · Bridgeton, MO AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 74% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #6/10
  • PHOTO Evoqua Water Technol…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~340 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Evoqua Water Technologies Holland (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Hunter Engineering Company - Headquarters in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hunter Engineering Company - Headquarters averages 2.4 TCR (74% of the Tire mounting machines, motor vehicle, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hunter Engineering Company - Headquarters TCR series: 2016=2.8 · 2017=2.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Hunter Engineering Company - Headquarters falls in its industry

361 Tire mounting machines, motor establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 10 Tire mounting machines, motor employers in Missouri.

Hunter Engineering Company - Headquarters (340 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Hunter Engineering Company - Headquarters
Hunter Engineering Company - Headquarters (340 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Hunter Engineering Company - Headquarters has more employees than the Tire mounting machines, motor vehicle, m median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 2.1 0.8 8 0 0
2016 2.8 2.8 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333318 · MO · Bridgeton

361 Tire mounting machines, motor vehicle, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 131 employers in Bridgeton, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Evoqua Water Technologies Holland 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR A. O. Smith Water Treatment (North America), Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR OCE-OSP Outside 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kewley Building 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Marceline South 340 FTE
STATE-SIZE Positronic Eldon Facility 340 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ducommun Joplin 340 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amazonas Administration 340 FTE
CITY-NEAR DePaul Hospital - St. Louis 1,683 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hussmann Corporation- Bridgeton MFG 1,004 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hussmann Corporation - Bridgeton 802 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1188 404 FTE
NAT-TCR 0322 - Fredericksburg, Va 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 0235 - Westland, Mi 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 0153 - Clinton Township, Mi 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Lisk Trucking Inc 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Provo Center (Utore) 340 FTE
NAT-SIZE Menlo Park (Camen) 340 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jet.com FC-6923 340 FTE
NAT-SIZE Saguaro Correctional 340 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.