Lawn and garden equipment manufacturing · Arkansas

Husqvarna Forestry Products N.A. Inc.

Nashville, AR · ~759 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Husqvarna Forestry Products N.A. Inc. runs at 15% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Lawn and garden equipment manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Husqvarna Forestry Products N.A. Inc.: 0.5 TCR = 15% of Lawn and garden equipment manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Husqvarna Forestry Products N.A. Inc. safety composite

Husqvarna Forestry Products N.A. Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 97% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 97% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Husqvarna Forestry Products N.A. Inc.: 0.1 → 0.9 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 0.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.1× in 2019

Husqvarna Forestry Products N.A. Inc.'s TCR rose 0.8 from 0.1 in 2016 to 0.9 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 1.1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333112 · Nashville, AR AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 15% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #2/5
  • PHOTO The Scotts Company -…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~759 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Scotts Company - Temecula (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

Husqvarna Forestry Products N.A. Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Husqvarna Forestry Products N.A. Inc. averages 0.5 TCR (15% of the Lawn and garden equipment manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Husqvarna Forestry Products N.A. Inc. TCR series: 2016=0.1 · 2017=0.3 · 2018=0.7 · 2019=0.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Husqvarna Forestry Products N.A. Inc. falls in its industry

91 Lawn and garden equipment manu establishments

Safer than 97% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arkansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 5 Lawn and garden equipment manu employers in Arkansas.

Husqvarna Forestry Products N.A. Inc. (759 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 240 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Husqvarna Forestry Products N.A. Inc.
Husqvarna Forestry Products N.A. Inc. (759 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 240 employees and a TCR of 3.6

Husqvarna Forestry Products N.A. Inc. has more employees than the Lawn and garden equipment manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.9 0.6 2 3 0
2018 0.7 0.2 3 1 0
2017 0.3 0.0 0 2 0
2016 0.1 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333112 · AR · Nashville

91 Lawn and garden equipment manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 21 employers in Nashville, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Scotts Company - Temecula 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Husqvarna Forestry ProductsN.A. Inc. Howard St 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Exmark Manufacturing Co Inc 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Turf Care 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Waldron Plant 759 FTE
STATE-SIZE Saline Memorial Hospital 758 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Arkansas Regional Medical Center 761 FTE
STATE-SIZE AR030 Crossett Paper 763 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nashville Plant 1,440 FTE
CITY-NEAR Husqvarna Outdoor Products Lawn & Garden 652 FTE
CITY-NEAR Husqvarna Plastics 215 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 33 212 FTE
NAT-TCR Mannington Wood 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Easter Seals Hawaii - Green Street 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Victoria Terminal 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR BWSR, LLC - Bettis Laboratory 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE MetLife Stadium 759 FTE
NAT-SIZE Valley Regional Medical Center 759 FTE
NAT-SIZE Twinstar Bakery 759 FTE
NAT-SIZE 300000380708813 - TX-Wilmer-Operating Center 759 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.