Commercial refrigeration equipment installation, service and repair · Arizona

Hussmann Services Corporation - Phoenix

Phoenix, AZ · ~86 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hussmann Services Corporation - Phoenix runs at 145% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Commercial refrigeration equipment installation, service and repair workplace, earning a grade D.

Hussmann Services Corporation - Phoenix: 3.0 TCR = 145% of Commercial refrigeration equipment installation, service and repair BLS 2.1 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hussmann Services Corporation - Phoenix safety composite

Hussmann Services Corporation - Phoenix scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Hussmann Services Corporation - Phoenix: 1.1 → 3.3 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 6.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.71× in 2024

Hussmann Services Corporation - Phoenix's TCR rose 2.2 from 1.1 in 2016 to 3.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 6.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.71× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Phoenix, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.0 · 145% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #19/34
  • PHOTO Windsor WECO
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~86 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Windsor WECO (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Hussmann Services Corporation - Phoenix in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hussmann Services Corporation - Phoenix averages 3.0 TCR (145% of the Commercial refrigeration equipment installation, service and repair BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hussmann Services Corporation - Phoenix TCR series: 2016=1.1 · 2017=2.7 · 2019=4.5 · 2021=0 · 2023=6.7 · 2024=3.3 · BLS 2.1

Where Hussmann Services Corporation - Phoenix falls in its industry

2,560 Commercial refrigeration equip establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 34 Commercial refrigeration equip employers in Arizona.

Hussmann Services Corporation - Phoenix (86 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Hussmann Services Corporation - Phoenix
Hussmann Services Corporation - Phoenix (86 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Hussmann Services Corporation - Phoenix has more employees than the Commercial refrigeration equipment insta median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.3 2.2 3 0 0
2023 6.7 4.5 6 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.5 3.4 3 1 0
2017 2.7 2.7 1 1 0
2016 1.1 1.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · AZ · Phoenix

2,560 Commercial refrigeration equipment installation, service and repair employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Windsor WECO 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Towlift Cleveland 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Abel Womack, Inc. - Lawrence 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR FMH Material Handling Solutions-El Paso TX 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE McElhaney Feedyard 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE MG Mountain Gate 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jasper 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Swengel-Robbins Inc. 86 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR 2546 - Waukesha South 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 2303 - Lincoln SW 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 2194 - Bismarck 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Delano CA 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 3262 - LA Glassell Park 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mastercraft Electric, Inc. 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Glenmark Construction Co., Inc. 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kilstrom Center 86 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.