Mechanical rubber goods (i.e., extruded, lathe-cut, molded) manufacturing · Michigan

Hutchinson Aerospace & Industry

Ithaca, MI · ~123 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hutchinson Aerospace & Industry runs at 52% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Mechanical rubber goods (i.e., extruded, lathe-cut, molded) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Hutchinson Aerospace & Industry: 1.7 TCR = 52% of Mechanical rubber goods (i.e., extruded, lathe-cut, molded) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hutchinson Aerospace & Industry safety composite

Hutchinson Aerospace & Industry scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Hutchinson Aerospace & Industry held a steady TCR band

Hutchinson Aerospace & Industry's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 5.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=0.0 · 2023=5.1 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326291 · Ithaca, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.7 · 52% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/16
  • PHOTO Lanxess Corporation-…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~123 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lanxess Corporation-RheinChemie Additives (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Hutchinson Aerospace & Industry in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hutchinson Aerospace & Industry averages 1.7 TCR (52% of the Mechanical rubber goods (i.e., extruded, lathe-cut, molded) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hutchinson Aerospace & Industry TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=5.1 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Hutchinson Aerospace & Industry falls in its industry

266 Mechanical rubber goods (i.e., establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 16 Mechanical rubber goods (i.e., employers in Michigan.

Hutchinson Aerospace & Industry (123 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Hutchinson Aerospace & Industry
Hutchinson Aerospace & Industry (123 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 3.6

Hutchinson Aerospace & Industry has more employees than the Mechanical rubber goods (i.e., extruded, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 5.1 2.6 5 1 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326291 · MI · Ithaca

266 Mechanical rubber goods (i.e., extruded, lathe-cut, molded) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 17 employers in Ithaca, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lanxess Corporation-RheinChemie Additives 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR ProMed Molded Products - Medina 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Victor Reinz Valve Seals, LLC 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cooper Standard 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Konoa dba Vande Bunte Eggs 123 FTE
STATE-SIZE Great Lakes Energy - Boyne 123 FTE
STATE-SIZE Elevated Technologies, Inc. 123 FTE
STATE-SIZE International Paper Three Rivers 123 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clover Technologies Group, LLC - Ithaca Raycraft 91 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clover Technologies Group, LLC - Ithaca Union 90 FTE
CITY-NEAR Trident Manufacturing 80 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clover Imaging Group LLC - Ithaca, MI (Union St) 76 FTE
NAT-TCR Johnson Electric Saia-Burgess 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Fabricators Unlimited 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR B & B Hydraulics, Inc 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR J.C. Lee Construction & Supply Co., Inc. 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Faurecia Exhaust Systems, Inc. 123 FTE
NAT-SIZE Senior High School 123 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cordova Health and Rehabilitation, LLC 123 FTE
NAT-SIZE Somerset Ridge Center 123 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.