Rubber goods, mechanical (i.e., extruded, lathe-cut, molded), manufacturing · Michigan

Hutchinson Anti Vibration Systems, Inc

Grand Rapids, MI · ~310 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hutchinson Anti Vibration Systems, Inc runs at 62% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Rubber goods, mechanical (i.e., extruded, lathe-cut, molded), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Hutchinson Anti Vibration Systems, Inc: 2.0 TCR = 62% of Rubber goods, mechanical (i.e., extruded, lathe-cut, molded), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hutchinson Anti Vibration Systems, Inc safety composite

Hutchinson Anti Vibration Systems, Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.9

2018→2021

Hutchinson Anti Vibration Systems, Inc injury rate improved

Hutchinson Anti Vibration Systems, Inc's TCR fell 1.9 from 2.6 in 2018 to 0.7 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.1 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.33× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=2.6 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=1.8 · 2021=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326291 · Grand Rapids, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 62% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #5/16
  • PHOTO Bradley
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~310 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bradley (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Hutchinson Anti Vibration Systems, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hutchinson Anti Vibration Systems, Inc averages 2.0 TCR (62% of the Rubber goods, mechanical (i.e., extruded, lathe-cut, molded), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hutchinson Anti Vibration Systems, Inc TCR series: 2018=2.6 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=1.8 · 2021=0.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Hutchinson Anti Vibration Systems, Inc falls in its industry

266 Rubber goods, mechanical (i.e. establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 16 Rubber goods, mechanical (i.e. employers in Michigan.

Hutchinson Anti Vibration Systems, Inc (310 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Hutchinson Anti Vibration Systems, Inc
Hutchinson Anti Vibration Systems, Inc (310 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 3.6

Hutchinson Anti Vibration Systems, Inc has more employees than the Rubber goods, mechanical (i.e., extrude median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.7 0.7 2 0 0
2020 1.8 0.4 5 0 0
2019 3.1 2.7 8 0 0
2018 2.6 0.6 5 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326291 · MI · Grand Rapids

266 Rubber goods, mechanical (i.e., extruded, lathe-cut, molded), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 1,006 employers in Grand Rapids, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bradley 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Molded 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR ASC Ashtabula Manufacturing 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tremco Incorporated - Ashland Plant 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Zoetis GMS North 310 FTE
STATE-SIZE YFAI - Frenchtown 2 310 FTE
STATE-SIZE Meijer Store 123 310 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5472 310 FTE
CITY-NEAR SHHG-GR BUTTERWORTH CA 9,012 FTE
CITY-NEAR SH Butterworth Hospital 7,397 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health Saint Mary's Hospital-MH-MI 2,914 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steelcase - Grand Rapids / Kentwood 2,817 FTE
NAT-TCR Panama Transfer 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Multi-Color Corporation - York 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Parkview Medical Group-CPO 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 1725 Young Ct, Norcross, GA 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Phc-Fort Morgan Inc 310 FTE
NAT-SIZE Envision Inc - Water 310 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4818-ORWI 310 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0468 - Douglas County Co Whse 310 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.