Boards, wood, made from logs or bolts · North Carolina

H.W. Culp Lumber Company Inc

New London, NC · ~118 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

H.W. Culp Lumber Company Inc runs at 34% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Boards, wood, made from logs or bolts workplace, earning a grade A.

H.W. Culp Lumber Company Inc: 1.1 TCR = 34% of Boards, wood, made from logs or bolts BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

H.W. Culp Lumber Company Inc safety composite

H.W. Culp Lumber Company Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.6

2016→2024

H.W. Culp Lumber Company Inc injury rate improved

H.W. Culp Lumber Company Inc's TCR fell 2.6 from 2.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.6 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=2.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=1.9 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321113 · New London, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 34% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/34
  • PHOTO IDABEL
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~118 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: IDABEL (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

H.W. Culp Lumber Company Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows H.W. Culp Lumber Company Inc averages 1.1 TCR (34% of the Boards, wood, made from logs or bolts BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

H.W. Culp Lumber Company Inc TCR series: 2016=2.6 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=2 · 2021=0 · 2022=1.9 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where H.W. Culp Lumber Company Inc falls in its industry

905 Boards, wood, made from logs o establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 34 Boards, wood, made from logs o employers in North Carolina.

H.W. Culp Lumber Company Inc (118 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate H.W. Culp Lumber Company Inc
H.W. Culp Lumber Company Inc (118 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.2

H.W. Culp Lumber Company Inc has more employees than the Boards, wood, made from logs or bolts median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.9 0.0 0 2 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.0 2.0 2 0 0
2019 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2018 1.7 0.0 0 2 0
2016 2.6 0.8 1 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321113 · NC · New London

905 Boards, wood, made from logs or bolts employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 9 employers in New London, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR IDABEL 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Interfor LLC Fayette Division 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Speyside Bourbon Stave Mill in McDermott Ohio, Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Interfor - Baxley Division 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE D34 Charlotte 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE American Skin Food Group 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE Yanjan USA LLC 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE Leggett & Platt 118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fiberon Decking 1NL 349 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fiberon - 1NL Facility 288 FTE
CITY-NEAR UFP - New London, LLC. 86 FTE
CITY-NEAR Southern Pipe, Inc 82 FTE
NAT-TCR Little Dixie Construction 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Lathrop Construction Associates 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Superior Mechanical Tennessee Valley Company 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR GNH Services, Inc 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Oakland Nursery - New Albany 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE Industrial Boiler & Mechanical Co Inc 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE Berry Global 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arcadia at Limerick Pointe 118 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.