Filters, industrial and general line (except internal combustion engine, warm air furnace), manufacturing · Indiana

Hy-Pro Filtration

Anderson, IN · ~141 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hy-Pro Filtration runs at 137% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Filters, industrial and general line (except internal combustion engine, warm air furnace), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Hy-Pro Filtration: 4.5 TCR = 137% of Filters, industrial and general line (except internal combustion engine, warm air furnace), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hy-Pro Filtration safety composite

Hy-Pro Filtration scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.6

2019→2024

Hy-Pro Filtration injury rate improved

Hy-Pro Filtration's TCR fell 11.6 from 13.4 in 2019 to 1.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 13.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=13.4 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=2.5 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=1.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333999 · Anderson, IN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.5 · 137% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/12
  • PHOTO Seymour-Sheridan, In…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~141 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Seymour-Sheridan, Incorporated (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Hy-Pro Filtration in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hy-Pro Filtration averages 4.5 TCR (137% of the Filters, industrial and general line (except internal combustion engine, warm air furnace), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hy-Pro Filtration TCR series: 2019=13.4 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=2.5 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=1.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Hy-Pro Filtration falls in its industry

242 Filters, industrial and genera establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 12 Filters, industrial and genera employers in Indiana.

Hy-Pro Filtration (141 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Hy-Pro Filtration
Hy-Pro Filtration (141 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Hy-Pro Filtration has more employees than the Filters, industrial and general line (ex median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.8 0.0 3 0 0
2023 1.9 0.6 3 0 0
2022 2.5 0.0 3 1 0
2021 2.9 0.7 1 3 0
2019 13.4 10.4 8 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333999 · IN · Anderson

242 Filters, industrial and general line (except internal combustion engine, warm air furnace), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 103 employers in Anderson, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Seymour-Sheridan, Incorporated 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR GEA Mechanical Equipment US, Inc. 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Marietta Plant 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR IMTEC Acculine Inc 4.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Browning Chapman, LLC 141 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wagler Custom Homes LLC 141 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vincennes Bakery 141 FTE
STATE-SIZE Whitley Manufacturing Co., Inc. 141 FTE
CITY-NEAR Carter Express Inc 1,329 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Hospital Anderson 1,212 FTE
CITY-NEAR HARRAH'S HOOSIER PARK RACING & CASINO 804 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nestle USA 798 FTE
NAT-TCR Stephens Distributing Company 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Encore Commercial Products, Inc. 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Wyndemere Homeowners Association 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Kenwood 4.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bridgewater Marriott 141 FTE
NAT-SIZE Orrvilon, Inc. 141 FTE
NAT-SIZE Channel Fish Processing Co Inc. 141 FTE
NAT-SIZE Christus Spohn Hospital Shoreline - EVS 141 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.