Hotels (except casino hotels) · Illinois

Hyatt Centric The Loop Chicago

Chicago, IL · ~40 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.2
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hyatt Centric The Loop Chicago runs at 207% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Hotels (except casino hotels) workplace, earning a grade F.

Hyatt Centric The Loop Chicago: 6.2 TCR = 207% of Hotels (except casino hotels) BLS 3.0 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hyatt Centric The Loop Chicago safety composite

Hyatt Centric The Loop Chicago scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Hyatt Centric The Loop Chicago: 5.1 → 14.9 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 14.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.71× in 2022

Hyatt Centric The Loop Chicago's TCR rose 9.8 from 5.1 in 2016 to 14.9 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 1.71× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · Chicago, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.2 · 207% of ind

  • DART 10.7 DART
  • RANK #239/345
  • PHOTO Sonesta Select Miami…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sonesta Select Miami Lakes (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Hyatt Centric The Loop Chicago in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hyatt Centric The Loop Chicago averages 6.2 TCR (207% of the Hotels (except casino hotels) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hyatt Centric The Loop Chicago TCR series: 2016=5.1 · 2017=6.8 · 2018=3.6 · 2019=5.8 · 2020=0 · 2021=7.3 · 2022=14.9 · BLS 3.0

Where Hyatt Centric The Loop Chicago falls in its industry

9,342 Hotels (except casino hotels) establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #239 safest of 345 Hotels (except casino hotels) employers in Illinois.

Hyatt Centric The Loop Chicago (40 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Hyatt Centric The Loop Chicago
Hyatt Centric The Loop Chicago (40 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Hyatt Centric The Loop Chicago has fewer employees than the Hotels (except casino hotels) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 14.9 10.7 7 0 0
2021 7.3 3.6 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 5.8 5.8 3 0 0
2018 3.6 3.6 2 0 0
2017 6.8 0.0 4 0 0
2016 5.1 3.4 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · IL · Chicago

9,342 Hotels (except casino hotels) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 2,934 employers in Chicago, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sonesta Select Miami Lakes 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR ES Auburn Hills 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hotel Madera 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Disney Vacation Club Hawaii Mgmt Co., LLC, dba Aulani, A Disney Resort & Spa, Ko Olina, Hawaii 6.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE AMEREN ILLINOIS - Gas Integrity Management 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE NG Bloomington Reporting Center 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Downers Grove Sanitary District 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Window Works Addison 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago Public Schools 49,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago/Corporate 18,831 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Illinois at Chicago 13,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Health Service UIC UIC Campus 12,732 FTE
NAT-TCR 6795-01129B02 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 6458-ZMTG 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Tallgrass Estates 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Bed Bath and Beyond Newport Middletown 6.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE NFI Interactive Logistics, LLC-7001 SOUTH FWY 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Massillon Purina Feed Mill 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fox Acura 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Agility Fuel Solutions - Fontana 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.