Alpine skiing facilities with accommodations (i.e., ski resort) · North Carolina

Hyatt House Raleigh North Hills

Raleigh, NC · ~36 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hyatt House Raleigh North Hills runs at 81% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Alpine skiing facilities with accommodations (i.e., ski resort) workplace, earning a grade C.

Hyatt House Raleigh North Hills: 2.4 TCR = 81% of Alpine skiing facilities with accommodations (i.e., ski resort) BLS 3.0 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hyatt House Raleigh North Hills safety composite

Hyatt House Raleigh North Hills scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2016→2024

Hyatt House Raleigh North Hills injury rate improved

Hyatt House Raleigh North Hills's TCR fell 2.1 from 2.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 8.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.1 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=6.6 · 2023=8.3 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · Raleigh, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.4 · 81% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #66/239
  • PHOTO Hampton Inn
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hampton Inn (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Hyatt House Raleigh North Hills in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hyatt House Raleigh North Hills averages 2.4 TCR (81% of the Alpine skiing facilities with accommodations (i.e., ski resort) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hyatt House Raleigh North Hills TCR series: 2016=2.1 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=0 · 2021=6.6 · 2023=8.3 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.0

Where Hyatt House Raleigh North Hills falls in its industry

9,342 Alpine skiing facilities with establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #66 safest of 239 Alpine skiing facilities with employers in North Carolina.

Hyatt House Raleigh North Hills (36 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Hyatt House Raleigh North Hills
Hyatt House Raleigh North Hills (36 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Hyatt House Raleigh North Hills has fewer employees than the Alpine skiing facilities with accommodat median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 8.3 8.3 2 0 0
2021 6.6 6.6 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 2.1 2.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · NC · Raleigh

9,342 Alpine skiing facilities with accommodations (i.e., ski resort) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 973 employers in Raleigh, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hampton Inn 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Battery Wharf Hotel 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Holua 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fairfield Inn Suites by Marriott 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Butterball Hatchery # 1 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Carolina Farms (CV) 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Yadkin 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Edgecombe Genco, LLC. 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR Headway Workforce Solutions 13,936 FTE
CITY-NEAR NC State University 11,491 FTE
CITY-NEAR UNC Rex Healthcare 7,282 FTE
CITY-NEAR SECU 6,283 FTE
NAT-TCR San Joaquin County Employment and Economic Development Department 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Gawar - Warrenton 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Kymay - Maysville 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Addison Place 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Store 1482 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Office of Executive Management 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2200 Riverside 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Royalton Public Schools 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.