Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) · Massachusetts

Hyatt Regency Cambridge

Cambridge, MA · ~97 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hyatt Regency Cambridge runs at 55% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) workplace, earning a grade B.

Hyatt Regency Cambridge: 1.7 TCR = 55% of Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) BLS 3.0 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hyatt Regency Cambridge safety composite

Hyatt Regency Cambridge scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Hyatt Regency Cambridge: 0.0 → 5.1 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 5.1 TCR · DART/TCR 2.45× in 2024

Hyatt Regency Cambridge's TCR rose 5.1 from 0.0 in 2019 to 5.1 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2.45× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · Cambridge, MA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.7 · 55% of ind

  • DART 4.1 DART
  • RANK #20/204
  • PHOTO Residence Inn
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~97 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Residence Inn (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Hyatt Regency Cambridge in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hyatt Regency Cambridge averages 1.7 TCR (55% of the Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hyatt Regency Cambridge TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=1.9 · 2023=3 · 2024=5.1 · BLS 3.0

Where Hyatt Regency Cambridge falls in its industry

9,342 Hotel management services (i.e establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 204 Hotel management services (i.e employers in Massachusetts.

Hyatt Regency Cambridge (97 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Hyatt Regency Cambridge
Hyatt Regency Cambridge (97 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Hyatt Regency Cambridge has more employees than the Hotel management services (i.e., providi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.1 4.1 5 0 0
2023 3.0 3.0 3 0 0
2022 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · MA · Cambridge

9,342 Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 149 employers in Cambridge, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Residence Inn 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hyatt House Portland 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Drury Inn & Suites - Springfield, MO 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR LaQuinta Inn & Suites-Haz 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Capeway Roofing Systems, Inc. 97 FTE
STATE-SIZE Limbach - New England 97 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hub Foundation 97 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dole and Bailey 97 FTE
CITY-NEAR Philips NAM Field Sales & Service 5,136 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vinfen Corporation 2,662 FTE
CITY-NEAR Biogen - Cambridge 2,478 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cambridge Campus 2,473 FTE
NAT-TCR Auria Albemarle 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Radial Inc MTV 1 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Hydro Cressona 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Mill Creek 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tempo Communications, Inc. 97 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harris Health and Rehab 97 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mom's Meals IA Fulfillment 97 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4004 - Tpg/Pgs 97 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.