Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) · Florida

Hyatt Regency Sarasota

Sarasota, FL · ~105 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hyatt Regency Sarasota runs at 116% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) workplace, earning a grade C.

Hyatt Regency Sarasota: 3.5 TCR = 116% of Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) BLS 3.0 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hyatt Regency Sarasota safety composite

Hyatt Regency Sarasota scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 65% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Hyatt Regency Sarasota: 2.1 → 3.6 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 4.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.51× in 2021

Hyatt Regency Sarasota's TCR rose 1.4 from 2.1 in 2017 to 3.6 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 4.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · Sarasota, FL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.5 · 116% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #314/881
  • PHOTO Homestead Hampton In…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~105 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Homestead Hampton Inn & Suites (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Hyatt Regency Sarasota in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hyatt Regency Sarasota averages 3.5 TCR (116% of the Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hyatt Regency Sarasota TCR series: 2017=2.1 · 2018=3.9 · 2020=4.2 · 2021=3.6 · BLS 3.0

Where Hyatt Regency Sarasota falls in its industry

9,342 Hotel management services (i.e establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #314 safest of 881 Hotel management services (i.e employers in Florida.

Hyatt Regency Sarasota (105 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Hyatt Regency Sarasota
Hyatt Regency Sarasota (105 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Hyatt Regency Sarasota has more employees than the Hotel management services (i.e., providi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 3.6 1.8 2 0 0
2020 4.2 4.2 2 0 0
2018 3.9 3.0 4 0 0
2017 2.1 2.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · FL · Sarasota

9,342 Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 504 employers in Sarasota, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Homestead Hampton Inn & Suites 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tru by Hilton Northlake 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 13996 CENTRAL HAWAII ENGINEERING SERVICES 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 17108 DT ALANA WAIKIKI BEACH HI 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Southern Hill Farms Market 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE Homestead 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE Area Office - Broward 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE MRI Richmond Service Center 105 FTE
CITY-NEAR Beneva Lakes 3,238 FTE
CITY-NEAR Blue Butterfly- Lakewood Ranch 2,476 FTE
CITY-NEAR Connexis Physicians 2,476 FTE
CITY-NEAR Treasures Thrift Shop II 2,476 FTE
NAT-TCR Gulf Coast Repair & Machine Shop 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Comfort Inn - Woodstock 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Meijer Store 134 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Holland Walls Plant 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ehmke Manufacturing Company, Inc. 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE UGL Scranton PA 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE Central Matsu Fire Department 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE Priority Nissan Newport News 105 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.