Construction management, power and communication transmission line · Michigan

Hydaker-Wheatlake Zilwaukee

Name: Hydaker-Wheatlake Zilwaukee Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Zilwaukee, MI · ~38 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

B
Good Safety Record: 2.2
Avg TCR: 2.8
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hydaker-Wheatlake Zilwaukee runs at 78% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Construction management, power and communication transmission line workplace, earning a grade B.

Hydaker-Wheatlake Zilwaukee: 2.2 TCR = 78% of Construction management, power and communication transmission line BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hydaker-Wheatlake Zilwaukee safety composite

Hydaker-Wheatlake Zilwaukee scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): D 2.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Hydaker-Wheatlake Zilwaukee held a steady TCR band

Hydaker-Wheatlake Zilwaukee's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 13.0 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=13.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Zilwaukee, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 78% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #42/54
PHOTO Michels Power Inc-IN…
BOOK 6y book
INJ 1 inj
SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Michels Power Inc-IN-Rolling Prairie (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

This site

2.2
Michels Power

2.2
Black & Veatch

2.2
Pike Virginia

2.2
STS Communicat

2.2

What this shows Hydaker-Wheatlake Zilwaukee averages 2.2 TCR (78% of the Construction management, power and communication transmission line BLS benchmark).

Hydaker-Wheatlake Zilwaukee TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=13 · 2021=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Hydaker-Wheatlake Zilwaukee falls in its industry

1,605 Construction management, power establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

Grade B

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #42 safest of 54 Construction management, power employers in Michigan.

Hydaker-Wheatlake Zilwaukee (38 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Hydaker-Wheatlake Zilwaukee has fewer employees than the Construction management, power and commu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries
2021	0.0	0.0	0
2020	13.0	13.0	1
2019	0.0	0.0	0
2018	0.0	0.0	0
2017	0.0	0.0	0
2016	0.0	0.0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · MI · Zilwaukee

1,605 Construction management, power and communication transmission line employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Michels Power Inc-IN-Rolling Prairie	ROLLING PRAIRIE, IN	2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Black & Veatch - PJSLATING	SLATINGTON, PA	2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Pike Virginia Statewide Operations	MOUNT AIRY, NC	2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	STS Communications INC	SOUDERTON, PA	2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Westview Orchards	WASHINGTON	38 FTE
STATE-SIZE	C3 Industries, Inc - Webberville (Indoor)	WEBBERVILLE	38 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Great Lakes Packing Co. Kewadin	KEWADIN	38 FTE
STATE-SIZE	McConnell & Scully, Inc.	HOMER	38 FTE
NAT-TCR	Kermit	Kermit, TX	2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	Tremont, The	Oviedo, FL	2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	ABS Building Systems Integrators, LLC	Mckeespoort, PA	2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	Freud America, Inc - High Point NC	High Point, NC	2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE	BostonFresh	Brockton, MA	38 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Whse 508 - 91st Ave.	Tolleson, AZ	38 FTE
NAT-SIZE	#4 Cambridge	Cambridge, OH	38 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Chantilly, VA Office PS	Chantilly, VA	38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.