Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Michigan

Hyde Park Assisted Living

Flushing, MI · ~39 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hyde Park Assisted Living runs at 113% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Hyde Park Assisted Living: 4.3 TCR = 113% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hyde Park Assisted Living safety composite

Hyde Park Assisted Living scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.4

2016→2021

Hyde Park Assisted Living injury rate improved

Hyde Park Assisted Living's TCR fell 8.4 from 12.0 in 2016 to 3.6 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 12.0 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.84× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=12.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=10.1 · 2021=3.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Flushing, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.3 · 113% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #64/201
  • PHOTO The Meridian at Boca…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Meridian at Boca Raton (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Hyde Park Assisted Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hyde Park Assisted Living averages 4.3 TCR (113% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hyde Park Assisted Living TCR series: 2016=12 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=10.1 · 2021=3.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Hyde Park Assisted Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #64 safest of 201 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Michigan.

Hyde Park Assisted Living (39 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Hyde Park Assisted Living
Hyde Park Assisted Living (39 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Hyde Park Assisted Living has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 3.6 3.6 1 0 0
2020 10.1 6.8 3 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 12.0 6.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MI · Flushing

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 19 employers in Flushing, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Meridian at Boca Raton 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gardens of Rose Hill 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR SPRING ARBOR OF OUTER BANKS 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cedarwood at Sandy 4.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mount Hope Dairy 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE CFI - Livonia 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dart Facilities 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cripps Fontaine Excavating, INC 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ultra-Dex, LLC 545 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fessler & Bowman 541 FTE
CITY-NEAR Heartland Health Care Center - Fostrian 177 FTE
CITY-NEAR Heartland Health Care Center Fostrian 160 FTE
NAT-TCR Dhaliwal Labs LLC 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Manorcare Dallastown 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Thibiant International 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Jabil Packaging Solutions 4.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Klemm Tank Lines 53011 Milwaukee 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Houston SF 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Field Office 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4769-859-Williams Sonoma 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.