Control valves, fluid power, manufacturing · California

Hydraflow

Fullerton, CA · ~276 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hydraflow runs at 113% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Control valves, fluid power, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Hydraflow: 3.7 TCR = 113% of Control valves, fluid power, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hydraflow safety composite

Hydraflow scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 22% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

13/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Hydraflow: 2.9 → 7.6 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 7.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.07× in 2024

Hydraflow's TCR rose 4.8 from 2.9 in 2017 to 7.6 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.07× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332912 · Fullerton, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.7 · 113% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #7/12
  • PHOTO Cooper Standard Mio
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 70 inj
  • SIZE ~276 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cooper Standard Mio (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Hydraflow in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hydraflow averages 3.7 TCR (113% of the Control valves, fluid power, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hydraflow TCR series: 2017=2.9 · 2018=2.8 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=3.6 · 2021=3.2 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=3 · 2024=7.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Hydraflow falls in its industry

182 Control valves, fluid power, m establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 12 Control valves, fluid power, m employers in California.

Hydraflow (276 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 88 employees and a TCR of 2.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Hydraflow
Hydraflow (276 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 88 employees and a TCR of 2.1

Hydraflow has more employees than the Control valves, fluid power, manufacturi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.6 4.0 16 5 0
2023 3.0 0.7 6 3 0
2022 3.3 3.3 9 0 0
2021 3.2 2.4 8 0 0
2020 3.6 3.0 8 3 0
2019 3.5 3.5 11 0 0
2018 2.8 2.5 6 2 1
2017 2.9 2.9 6 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332912 · CA · Fullerton

182 Control valves, fluid power, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 167 employers in Fullerton, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cooper Standard Mio 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pneumadyne, LLC 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Graco High Pressure Equipment 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR LDI Manitowoc 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Schneider Electric CMF 276 FTE
STATE-SIZE USA Millwork - Mission Bell, LLC 276 FTE
STATE-SIZE Michael Cadillac, Inc. 276 FTE
STATE-SIZE Burbank Town Center 504 276 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA692 ST JUDE MEDICAL CENTER HR 2,718 FTE
CITY-NEAR SASCO 705 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Fullerton 692 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fullerton / Orange 636 FTE
NAT-TCR McKay-Gross Division 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR US Gypsum Baltimore 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Filtros Limited 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR owens electric co 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Green Rock Correctional Center 276 FTE
NAT-SIZE NOW Foods -Sparks 276 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chattanooga 276 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wichita 276 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.