Tubing, mechanical and hypodermic sizes, cold-drawn stainless steel, made from purchased steel · Michigan

Hydraulic Tubes & Fittings, LLC

Lapeer, MI · ~65 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hydraulic Tubes & Fittings, LLC runs at 498% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Tubing, mechanical and hypodermic sizes, cold-drawn stainless steel, made from purchased steel workplace, earning a grade F.

Hydraulic Tubes & Fittings, LLC: 16.4 TCR = 498% of Tubing, mechanical and hypodermic sizes, cold-drawn stainless steel, made from purchased steel BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hydraulic Tubes & Fittings, LLC safety composite

Hydraulic Tubes & Fittings, LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−14.6

2022→2024

Hydraulic Tubes & Fittings, LLC injury rate improved

Hydraulic Tubes & Fittings, LLC's TCR fell 14.6 from 26.5 in 2022 to 11.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 26.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=26.5 · 2023=10.9 · 2024=11.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331210 · Lapeer, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 16.4 · 498% of ind

  • DART 5.3 DART
  • RANK #14/16
  • PHOTO Bull Moose Tube
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 33 inj
  • SIZE ~65 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bull Moose Tube (0.5 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Hydraulic Tubes & Fittings, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hydraulic Tubes & Fittings, LLC averages 16.4 TCR (498% of the Tubing, mechanical and hypodermic sizes, cold-drawn stainless steel, made from purchased steel BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hydraulic Tubes & Fittings, LLC TCR series: 2022=26.5 · 2023=10.9 · 2024=11.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Hydraulic Tubes & Fittings, LLC falls in its industry

329 Tubing, mechanical and hypoder establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 16 Tubing, mechanical and hypoder employers in Michigan.

Hydraulic Tubes & Fittings, LLC (65 employees, TCR 16.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Hydraulic Tubes & Fittings, LLC
Hydraulic Tubes & Fittings, LLC (65 employees, TCR 16.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3

Hydraulic Tubes & Fittings, LLC has fewer employees than the Tubing, mechanical and hypodermic sizes, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.9 5.3 8 1 0
2023 10.9 5.4 7 1 0
2022 26.5 7.4 18 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331210 · MI · Lapeer

329 Tubing, mechanical and hypodermic sizes, cold-drawn stainless steel, made from purchased steel employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 54 employers in Lapeer, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bull Moose Tube 16.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Iowa Steel Fabrication 15.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Major Metals Company 15.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR James Steel and Tube Co Main Branch 17.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ridgeview Orchards 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE PG Manufacturing 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Marquette Board of Light and Power 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE SunGlo 65 FTE
CITY-NEAR McLaren Lapeer Region 832 FTE
CITY-NEAR KAMAX Inc. Lapeer Facility 477 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kamax Inc. 443 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lapeer County Medical Care Facility 377 FTE
NAT-TCR TXD091 16.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Oak Terrace Senior Housing of Jordan 16.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Parkview Manor 16.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0767 St. Petersburg 16.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Vicor - Picor, Lincoln, RI 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Parkway Village Inc 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE C532 Greenville 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brand West Dairy 65 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.