Bar made by extruding purchased aluminum · Oregon

Hydro Portland Main Plant

Portland, OR · ~298 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hydro Portland Main Plant runs at 48% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Bar made by extruding purchased aluminum workplace, earning a grade A.

Hydro Portland Main Plant: 1.6 TCR = 48% of Bar made by extruding purchased aluminum BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hydro Portland Main Plant safety composite

Hydro Portland Main Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2019→2023

Hydro Portland Main Plant injury rate improved

Hydro Portland Main Plant's TCR fell 0.5 from 1.5 in 2019 to 1.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 3.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.66× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=1.5 · 2020=0.4 · 2021=3.2 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=1.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331318 · Portland, OR AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 48% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #1/5
  • PHOTO Rea Magnet Wire Hano…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~298 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rea Magnet Wire Hanover Manufacturing (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Hydro Portland Main Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hydro Portland Main Plant averages 1.6 TCR (48% of the Bar made by extruding purchased aluminum BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hydro Portland Main Plant TCR series: 2019=1.5 · 2020=0.4 · 2021=3.2 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=1 · BLS 3.3

Where Hydro Portland Main Plant falls in its industry

204 Bar made by extruding purchase establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 5 Bar made by extruding purchase employers in Oregon.

Hydro Portland Main Plant (298 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 144 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Hydro Portland Main Plant
Hydro Portland Main Plant (298 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 144 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Hydro Portland Main Plant has more employees than the Bar made by extruding purchased aluminum median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.0 1.0 2 0 0
2022 1.6 1.3 8 1 0
2021 3.2 2.4 8 0 0
2020 0.4 0.4 1 0 0
2019 1.5 0.4 2 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331318 · OR · Portland

204 Bar made by extruding purchased aluminum employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 1,728 employers in Portland, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rea Magnet Wire Hanover Manufacturing 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR OBE - Midway 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elkhart IN 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Penn Aluminum International LLC 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE 5396 298 FTE
STATE-SIZE 875 PORTLAND 298 FTE
STATE-SIZE Avangrid Renewables - Corporate Office 297 FTE
STATE-SIZE Engineering and Technical Services 299 FTE
CITY-NEAR OHSU Main Campus 18,003 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR349 PROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MEDICAL CTR-PORTLA 4,033 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR346 PROVIDENCE PORTLAND MEDICAL CTR-PORTLAND 3,684 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000530 3,498 FTE
NAT-TCR Smurfit Kappa Forney Mill 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Bergstrom INC., Blackhawk Rd 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Bay Country Professional Concrete, LLC 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Rassey Industries, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rappahannock Westminster Canterbury 298 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mitchell County Hospital Health Systems 298 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Union City 298 FTE
NAT-SIZE Johnson Equipment Company 298 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.