Bacterins (i.e., bacterial vaccines) manufacturing · California

Hygieia Biological Laboratories - Harter

Woodland, CA · ~38 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hygieia Biological Laboratories - Harter runs at 79% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Bacterins (i.e., bacterial vaccines) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Hygieia Biological Laboratories - Harter: 2.6 TCR = 79% of Bacterins (i.e., bacterial vaccines) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hygieia Biological Laboratories - Harter safety composite

Hygieia Biological Laboratories - Harter scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2019→2021

Hygieia Biological Laboratories - Harter injury rate improved

Hygieia Biological Laboratories - Harter's TCR fell 0.4 from 4.1 in 2019 to 3.7 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 4.1 TCR. In 2021, DART was 1.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=4.1 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=3.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325414 · Woodland, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.6 · 79% of ind

  • DART 3.7 DART
  • RANK #21/29
  • PHOTO Kite Pharma US, Ocea…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Kite Pharma US, Oceanside (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Hygieia Biological Laboratories - Harter in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hygieia Biological Laboratories - Harter averages 2.6 TCR (79% of the Bacterins (i.e., bacterial vaccines) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hygieia Biological Laboratories - Harter TCR series: 2019=4.1 · 2020=0 · 2021=3.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Hygieia Biological Laboratories - Harter falls in its industry

234 Bacterins (i.e., bacterial vac establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 29 Bacterins (i.e., bacterial vac employers in California.

Hygieia Biological Laboratories - Harter (38 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 198 employees and a TCR of 1.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Hygieia Biological Laboratories - Harter
Hygieia Biological Laboratories - Harter (38 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 198 employees and a TCR of 1.2

Hygieia Biological Laboratories - Harter has fewer employees than the Bacterins (i.e., bacterial vaccines) man median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 3.7 3.7 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.1 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325414 · CA · Woodland

234 Bacterins (i.e., bacterial vaccines) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 172 employers in Woodland, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Kite Pharma US, Oceanside 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sonac - Maquoketa 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Biomune Company Lenexa 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Post Falls Division 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE CAL-O SHIPPING 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE GAR & S Farm Labor Services, Inc. 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Supreme Almonds of California, Inc. 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bays Ranch Inc 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 800 2,413 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0555 - Woodland CA DC 1,759 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0555 - Sacramento DC 1,196 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030173 820 FTE
NAT-TCR Ken Batchelor Cadillac 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR R & S Track Maintenance, INC 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR GreenWood, Inc. - GE Gas Turbine 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Corporate Sandston 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Elizabeth Residence Inn 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE John Brown Portersville 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tri County Farmers Association - Marianna 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE QMP 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.