Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation · Missouri

Iatan Generating Station

Weston, MO · ~200 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Iatan Generating Station runs at 186% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation workplace, earning a grade D.

Iatan Generating Station: 2.2 TCR = 186% of Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation BLS 1.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Iatan Generating Station safety composite

Iatan Generating Station scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Iatan Generating Station: 0.0 → 3.2 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 4.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.87× in 2024

Iatan Generating Station's TCR rose 3.2 from 0.0 in 2018 to 3.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 4.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.87× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Weston, MO ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 2.2 · 186% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #21/42
  • PHOTO Milton R. Young Stat…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~200 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Milton R. Young Station (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Iatan Generating Station in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Iatan Generating Station averages 2.2 TCR (186% of the Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Iatan Generating Station TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=1 · 2021=2.2 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=4.5 · 2024=3.2 · BLS 1.2

Where Iatan Generating Station falls in its industry

846 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Gen establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 42 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Gen employers in Missouri.

Iatan Generating Station (200 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Iatan Generating Station
Iatan Generating Station (200 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Iatan Generating Station has more employees than the Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.2 1.9 5 0 0
2023 4.5 3.2 7 0 0
2022 1.1 0.0 2 0 0
2021 2.2 0.6 4 0 0
2020 1.0 1.0 2 0 0
2019 3.5 1.6 11 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · MO · Weston

846 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 4 employers in Weston, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Milton R. Young Station 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Basin Electric Power Cooperative - Leland Olds Station 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hay Road Energy Center 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eversource - Schiller Station 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Staco Electric Construction CO 200 FTE
STATE-SIZE SIMMONS ANIMAL NUTRITION-DRY 200 FTE
STATE-SIZE Killark Electric 200 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fluid Connectors : Washington SPO206 200 FTE
CITY-NEAR KCP&L - Iatan Generation Facility 233 FTE
CITY-NEAR McCormick Distilling Co., Inc. 151 FTE
CITY-NEAR Snow Creek 65 FTE
NAT-TCR Harbor Village at Harbor Shores LLC 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Earthscapes Unlimited, Inc. 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Montgomeryville 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Unmapped Brewing Co. LLC 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE ShopRite of Wallkill 200 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bigfoot Beverages Eugene 200 FTE
NAT-SIZE Maple Woods Manor 200 FTE
NAT-SIZE Caven - Ventura Center 200 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.