Instruments, mechanical microsurgical, manufacturing · Arizona

I.C Medical Inc. (2002 W. Quail)

Phoenix, AZ · ~46 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

I.C Medical Inc. (2002 W. Quail) runs at 13% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Instruments, mechanical microsurgical, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

I.C Medical Inc. (2002 W. Quail): 0.4 TCR = 13% of Instruments, mechanical microsurgical, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

I.C Medical Inc. (2002 W. Quail) safety composite

I.C Medical Inc. (2002 W. Quail) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2020→2024

I.C Medical Inc. (2002 W. Quail) injury rate improved

I.C Medical Inc. (2002 W. Quail)'s TCR fell 2.1 from 2.1 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 2.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=2.1 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339112 · Phoenix, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 13% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/12
  • PHOTO Orthofix US LLC
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~46 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Orthofix US LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

I.C Medical Inc. (2002 W. Quail) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows I.C Medical Inc. (2002 W. Quail) averages 0.4 TCR (13% of the Instruments, mechanical microsurgical, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

I.C Medical Inc. (2002 W. Quail) TCR series: 2020=2.1 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where I.C Medical Inc. (2002 W. Quail) falls in its industry

741 Instruments, mechanical micros establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 12 Instruments, mechanical micros employers in Arizona.

I.C Medical Inc. (2002 W. Quail) (46 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 174 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate I.C Medical Inc. (2002 W. Quail)
I.C Medical Inc. (2002 W. Quail) (46 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 174 employees and a TCR of 1.5

I.C Medical Inc. (2002 W. Quail) has fewer employees than the Instruments, mechanical microsurgical, m median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.1 2.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339112 · AZ · Phoenix

741 Instruments, mechanical microsurgical, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Orthofix US LLC 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Indianola, PA 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR CathX - A Zeus Company 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR MCT Modern Catheter Technology Maplewood 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Utilities - Oasis WTP 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fountain Hills Sanitary District 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE SBF Foxfire 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pulte Development Corporation, Festival Ranch 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR U.S. Display Group TN 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Baxter Healthcare Largo 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Henry Leal 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Moline IL (Quad Cities IL) 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hanjin Global Logistics 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Donovan Salvage Works 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE McKenzie Farms 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clarence SC 46 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.