Chemicals (except agriculture) (e.g., automotive, household, industrial, photographic) merchant wholesalers · Colorado

ICC Pueblo

Pueblo, CO · ~41 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ICC Pueblo runs at 98% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Chemicals (except agriculture) (e.g., automotive, household, industrial, photographic) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade C.

ICC Pueblo: 2.2 TCR = 98% of Chemicals (except agriculture) (e.g., automotive, household, industrial, photographic) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ICC Pueblo safety composite

ICC Pueblo scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.4

2017→2024

ICC Pueblo injury rate improved

ICC Pueblo's TCR fell 6.4 from 6.4 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 7.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=6.4 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=7.1 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=3.8 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424690 · Pueblo, CO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.2 · 98% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/12
  • PHOTO Georgia Distribution…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Georgia Distribution Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

ICC Pueblo in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ICC Pueblo averages 2.2 TCR (98% of the Chemicals (except agriculture) (e.g., automotive, household, industrial, photographic) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ICC Pueblo TCR series: 2017=6.4 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=7.1 · 2022=0 · 2023=3.8 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.2

Where ICC Pueblo falls in its industry

766 Chemicals (except agriculture) establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 12 Chemicals (except agriculture) employers in Colorado.

ICC Pueblo (41 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate ICC Pueblo
ICC Pueblo (41 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 1.9

ICC Pueblo has more employees than the Chemicals (except agriculture) (e.g., au median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.8 3.8 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 7.1 7.1 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 6.4 6.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424690 · CO · Pueblo

766 Chemicals (except agriculture) (e.g., automotive, household, industrial, photographic) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 209 employers in Pueblo, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Georgia Distribution Center 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Houston 777 Brisbane HS 0875 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Portland IS/NFF 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hydrite Oshkosh - 28th St 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Colorado Beef 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gilcrest Feedlot 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE TORTUGA AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Montrose Maintenance Center 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR Parkview Medical Center 2,463 FTE
CITY-NEAR Parkview Health System 2,367 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Mary-Corwin Medical Center 1,451 FTE
CITY-NEAR EVRAZ Pueblo 1,128 FTE
NAT-TCR Silocaf USA 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR S03261 - Pine Bluff Landfill 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Stryker Endoscopy 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Lakeland - #104 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mitchell SD Truss 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fayette County Secondary Roads 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE US CA Moreno Valley DSC 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Knapheide Truck Equipment Company 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.