Flow instruments, industrial process-type, manufacturing · Texas

Ichor Systems - Austin

Name: Ichor Systems - Austin Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Austin, TX · ~111 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

A
Excellent Safety Record: 1.5
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ichor Systems - Austin runs at 44% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Flow instruments, industrial process-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Ichor Systems - Austin: 1.5 TCR = 44% of Flow instruments, industrial process-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ichor Systems - Austin safety composite

Ichor Systems - Austin scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): D 1.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.6

2018→2022

Ichor Systems - Austin injury rate improved

Ichor Systems - Austin's TCR fell 2.6 from 3.4 in 2018 to 0.8 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.4 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=3.4 · 2019=1.2 · 2020=1.0 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334513 · Austin, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.5 · 44% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #22/32
PHOTO QUEST-TEC SOLUTIONS,…
BOOK 5y book
INJ 7 inj
SIZE ~111 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: QUEST-TEC SOLUTIONS, INC. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

This site

1.5
QUEST-TEC SOLU

1.5
RJ GLOBAL WIKA

1.5
Warren

1.4
THERMOMETRICS

1.4

What this shows Ichor Systems - Austin averages 1.5 TCR (44% of the Flow instruments, industrial process-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Ichor Systems - Austin TCR series: 2018=3.4 · 2019=1.2 · 2020=1 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=0.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Ichor Systems - Austin falls in its industry

322 Flow instruments, industrial p establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

Grade A

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 32 Flow instruments, industrial p employers in Texas.

Ichor Systems - Austin (111 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 96 employees and a TCR of 1.3

Ichor Systems - Austin has more employees than the Flow instruments, industrial process-typ median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries
2022	0.8	0.0	1
2021	0.9	0.0	1
2020	1.0	1.0	1
2019	1.2	1.2	1
2018	3.4	2.3	3

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334513 · TX · Austin

322 Flow instruments, industrial process-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,645 employers in Austin, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	QUEST-TEC SOLUTIONS, INC.	HOUSTON, TX	1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	RJ GLOBAL WIKA	HOUSTON, TX	1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Warren	WARREN, NJ	1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR	THERMOMETRICS CORPORATION	NORTHRIDGE, CA	1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Supreme Production Services Inc.	CORPUS CHRISTI	111 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Sapphire Gas Solutions, LLC - Main Office	CONROE	111 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Turbine Maintenance Group	PASADENA	111 FTE
STATE-SIZE	BBLbc, LLC	PLANO	111 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Ensign Services	Austin	11,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR	NA-US-TX-Austin-Giga Texas	Austin	8,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR	6017-Loc: CORP LOC - US Austin	Austin	6,911 FTE
CITY-NEAR	6017-CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - AST	Austin	5,272 FTE
NAT-TCR	Howard 48350	Columbia, MD	1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	Sodexo at Univ S Florida-St Petersburg	Saint Petersburg, FL	1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	EMS - Cincinnati	Dayton, KY	1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	ARDx Pomona	Pomona, CA	1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE	West Tucson 39320	Tucson, AZ	111 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Servpro of Chesterfield, Tri-Citiies & Newport News	Midlothian, VA	111 FTE
NAT-SIZE	4765-LASPW9622	Las Vegas, NV	111 FTE
NAT-SIZE	4765-RNOCX0755	Reno, NV	111 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.