Labeling (i.e., packaging) machinery manufacturing · Texas

ID Technology

Ft. Worth, TX · ~177 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ID Technology runs at 49% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Labeling (i.e., packaging) machinery manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

ID Technology: 1.6 TCR = 49% of Labeling (i.e., packaging) machinery manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ID Technology safety composite

ID Technology scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

ID Technology held a steady TCR band

ID Technology's TCR held near 0.3 from 1.4 in 2016 to 1.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.4 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=3.7 · 2020=0.6 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=1.0 · 2024=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333993 · Ft. Worth, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 49% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #3/7
  • PHOTO Elmar Industries Inc.
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~177 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Elmar Industries Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

ID Technology in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ID Technology averages 1.6 TCR (49% of the Labeling (i.e., packaging) machinery manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ID Technology TCR series: 2016=1.4 · 2017=0 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=3.7 · 2020=0.6 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=1 · 2024=1.6 · BLS 3.3

Where ID Technology falls in its industry

269 Labeling (i.e., packaging) mac establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 7 Labeling (i.e., packaging) mac employers in Texas.

ID Technology (177 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate ID Technology
ID Technology (177 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 2.4

ID Technology has more employees than the Labeling (i.e., packaging) machinery man median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.6 0.5 3 0 0
2023 1.0 0.5 2 0 0
2022 1.7 1.1 3 0 0
2021 1.3 0.6 2 0 0
2020 0.6 0.0 1 0 0
2019 3.7 3.2 7 0 0
2018 3.1 3.1 5 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 1.4 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333993 · TX · Ft. Worth

269 Labeling (i.e., packaging) machinery manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 71 employers in Ft. Worth, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Elmar Industries Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Corporate Office 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR MGS Machine 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR IDT MN- Loftton Label 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE MidSouth Electric Co-op 177 FTE
STATE-SIZE Primoris Distribution Services - Area 70 177 FTE
STATE-SIZE 105359 - Orange County Advanced Power Station 177 FTE
STATE-SIZE XIT Paving and Construction, INC. 177 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6394-B2306 1,150 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2253-H4653 258 FTE
CITY-NEAR Empire Roofing Inc. 246 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vaden's Acoustics and Drywall 242 FTE
NAT-TCR Hyperion Florida 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR WAVE Benton Harbor 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Kansas Star Casino 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR International Paper - Springfield Mill 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kodiak Service Center 177 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cleveland Cliffs Monessen 177 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shady Lane, Inc. 177 FTE
NAT-SIZE Enterprise UTM 177 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.