Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing · Michigan

Ideal Building

Lansing, MI · ~44 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ideal Building runs at 269% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Ideal Building: 8.9 TCR = 269% of Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ideal Building safety composite

Ideal Building scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 14.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Ideal Building: 7.5 → 22.1 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 22.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.66× in 2021

Ideal Building's TCR rose 14.6 from 7.5 in 2016 to 22.1 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 1.66× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325412 · Lansing, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.9 · 269% of ind

  • DART 14.7 DART
  • RANK #32/33
  • PHOTO PolyCarbon Industries
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PolyCarbon Industries (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Ideal Building in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ideal Building averages 8.9 TCR (269% of the Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ideal Building TCR series: 2016=7.5 · 2017=8.7 · 2018=5.2 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=7.5 · 2021=22.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Ideal Building falls in its industry

855 Pharmaceutical preparations (e establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #32 safest of 33 Pharmaceutical preparations (e employers in Michigan.

Ideal Building (44 employees, TCR 8.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 171 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Ideal Building
Ideal Building (44 employees, TCR 8.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 171 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Ideal Building has fewer employees than the Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 22.1 14.7 3 0 0
2020 7.5 5.6 4 0 0
2019 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2018 5.2 3.9 3 1 0
2017 8.7 4.4 4 0 0
2016 7.5 5.6 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325412 · MI · Lansing

855 Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 410 employers in Lansing, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PolyCarbon Industries 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Captek Vista (J&D Laboratories) 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mobren Transport 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR SOFIE - Sterling 8.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE NW Planning & Design Center 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE SEMCO Energy Gas Company - Macomb 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Genesee County Water & Waste Services 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Anthony Ragnone Treatment Plant 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lansing Delta Township Assembly 2,608 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Motors Lansing Delta Township Assembly 2,446 FTE
CITY-NEAR LCC - Main 2,258 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lansing Grand River Assembly 1,648 FTE
NAT-TCR Lodge 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Leesburg Neighborhood 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Live Oak Homes Plant #2 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Gabriel Performance Products - HC 8.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE 160 Benicia, CA 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stone Mountain FS (SSS,SAT) 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE #12 Follansbee 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Muscatine (BAMG) 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.